Usability Evaluation of Business Process Modelling Tools through Software Quality Metrics

被引:4
|
作者
Nacheva, Radka [1 ]
Jansone, Anita [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ, 77 Kniaz Boris I Blvd, Varna 9002, Bulgaria
[2] Liepaja Univ, 14 Liela Str, LV-3401 Liepaja, Latvia
来源
BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING | 2020年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
usability; software modelling; business process modelling; software quality; TOPSIS; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.22364/bjmc.2020.8.4.04
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Due to the widening range of functionality, the software is becoming more complex, and there are a number of problems related to its ease of use, and specifically, its usability. The concept of "usability" is associated with the ease, efficiency and satisfaction of using any item, including computer technology. Specialists in the development of user interfaces face the challenge of creating products based on user experience and combining aesthetics, functionality, ergonomics, the ability to quickly accomplish the tasks, while also having to comply with the constraints imposed by the specificity of the activity for which the software applications are intended. It can be said that business process modelling software is characterized by medium and even high complexity due to the many functionalities they offer. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is to propose and implement a method for evaluation the usability of this type of product based on software quality metrics. As a supporting method for conducting the evaluation procedure we used Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. We evaluated some business process modelling tools for approbating the suggested method.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 542
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Usability evaluation of component based software system using software metrics
    Agarwal, Jyoti
    Dubey, Sanjay Kumar
    Tiwari, Rajdev
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2020, 14 (03): : 281 - 289
  • [2] QUIM: A framework for quantifying usability metrics in software quality models
    Seffah, A
    Kececi, N
    Donyaee, M
    SECOND ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 311 - 318
  • [3] Alternative Title: Usability evaluation of software debugging tools
    da Silva, Fabio Pereira
    de Souza, Higor Amario
    Chaim, Marcos Lordello
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS (SBSI2018), 2018, : 489 - 495
  • [4] Evaluation of Software Product Quality Metrics
    Molnar, Arthur-Jozsef
    Neamtu, Alexandra
    Motogna, Simona
    EVALUATION OF NOVEL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2020, 1172 : 163 - 187
  • [5] Usability evaluation based on international standards for software quality evaluation
    Toshihiro, Komiyama
    NEC TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 3 (02): : 27 - 32
  • [6] Software Usability Evaluation for Augmented Reality Through User Tests
    Kawakami, Guto
    Khurshid, Aasim
    Gadelha, Mikhail R.
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2021 - LATE BREAKING POSTERS, HCII 2021, PT I, 2021, 1498 : 349 - 356
  • [7] Software Quality Estimation through Object Oriented Design Metrics
    Arora, Deepak
    Khanna, Pooja
    Tripathi, Alpika
    Sharma, Shipra
    Shukla, Sanchika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2011, 11 (04): : 100 - 104
  • [8] Evaluating the Usability of Online Tools During Participatory Enterprise Modelling, Using the Business Model Canvas
    Venter, Anthea
    de Vries, Marne
    HCI IN BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT AND ORGANIZATIONS, PT II, HCIBGO 2024, 2024, 14721 : 96 - 114
  • [9] Quantifying the Usability Through a Variant of the Traditional Heuristic Evaluation Process
    Paz, Freddy
    Paz, Freddy A.
    Sanchez, Manuel
    Moquillaza, Arturo
    Collantes, Luis
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: THEORY AND PRACTICE, DUXU 2018, PT I, 2018, 10918 : 496 - 508
  • [10] Research on Appraisal Target System of Software Product Quality Metrics and Evaluation
    Liu, Mengyue
    Tan, Ligang
    Yu, Min
    Wang, Qiang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY (ICRMS), VOLS I AND II, 2014, : 401 - 406