Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: A randomised controlled trial

被引:30
作者
Elhao, Mounir [2 ]
Abdallah, Khaled [2 ]
Serag, Ihab [2 ]
El-Laithy, Mohamed [2 ]
Agur, Wael [1 ]
机构
[1] Crosshouse Hosp, Kilmarnock KA2 0BE, Scotland
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Bipolar diathermy; Hysterectomy; Suture; Vaginal; SURGERY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing using the LigaSure(R) system during vaginal hysterectomy in comparison with conventional suture ligation method. Study design: 103 patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions were randomised to either LigaSure(R) or Suture groups. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to the degree of surgical difficulty. Results: Participants in the LigaSure(R) had shorter procedure time (52.5 min vs. 90 min; p < 0.001) and less blood loss (230 ml vs. 360 ml; p < 0.001). Complication rates were not statistically different between the two groups. The advantage of the LigaSure(R) system in reducing the operative blood loss was more pronounced in the more difficult procedures. Conclusion: The LigaSure(R) system reduces the operating time (by reducing pedicle-securing time) and blood loss without increasing the post-operative complication rates of vaginal hysterectomy. This beneficial effect was found to be more pronounced in difficult procedures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 90
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Painless vaginal hysterectomy with thermal hemostasis (results of a series of 152 cases)
    Clave, H.
    Baar, H.
    Niccolai, P.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2005, 2 (02) : 101 - 105
  • [2] Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy
    Cronjé, HS
    de Coning, EC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (03) : 243 - 245
  • [3] Ding Z, 2005, J Obstet Gynaecol, V25, P49, DOI 10.1080/01443610400024609
  • [4] Dunn TS, 2006, J REPROD MED, V51, P83
  • [5] Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997
    Farquhar, CM
    Steiner, CA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [6] GARRY R, 2004, HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS, V8
  • [7] Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial
    Hefni, MA
    Bhaumik, J
    El-Toukhy, T
    Kho, P
    Wong, I
    Abdel-Razik, T
    Davies, AE
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (03) : 329 - 333
  • [8] Johnson N, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD003718.pub2]
  • [9] Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 2000 membership survey
    Kives, SL
    Levy, BS
    Levine, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2003, 10 (02): : 135 - 138
  • [10] Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy
    Levy, B
    Emery, L
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (01) : 147 - 151