Extrapolation of fractal dimensions of natural fracture networks from one to two dimensions in dolomites of Slovenia

被引:5
|
作者
Verbovsek, Timotej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Geol, Fac Nat Sci & Engn, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
dolomite; fracture networks; fractal dimension; extrapolation; SEDIMENTARY EVOLUTION; FAULT; DISTRIBUTIONS; FLOW; PATTERNS; GEOMETRY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12303-009-0032-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
If fractal properties of fractures are available only through 1-D measurements (boreholes or scanlines), it is essential to extrapolate the fractal dimensions from 1-D to 2-D values correctly. This paper focuses on such an extrapolation, obtained from twenty-two natural fracture net-works in Triassic dolomites in Slovenia. Fractures are analyzed by 1-D (in x- and y-directions) and 2-D box-counting methods. Networks are analyzed by several box-counting methods, by box-flex and box-rotate methods to determine the fractal dimensions in 2-D and consequently by the 'full' method (using all data points in the log-log plot) and the more appropriate 'cut-off' method (using data greater than the cut-off points), which are used for comparison of 1-D and 2-D data. According to theoretical presumptions, extrapolation of fractal dimension from I-D to 2-D should be straight-foiivard: D2-D = D1-D + 1 (D2-D being fractal dimension measured in 2-D environment and the D1-D being fractal dimension measured in I-D environment). Results show, that the values of fractal dimensions obtained in a I-D environment are very similar and lie in a very narrow, data range. This can be attributed to the similar fracturing style of dolomites or isotropy of fractures. Results obtained by the 'cut-off' method give higher values of D than the 'full' method, as only appropriate data values were considered in calculations. Values of one-dimensional values off) can be reliably, extrapolated to a two-dimensional environment by equation D2-D* D1-D* + 1.03 for the 'cut-off' method 2-D = D1-D + 1.06 for the 'full' method. Both differences between and D1-D and D2-D values are very close to a theoretical value of 1.00, so the fracture networks in dolomites can be described as nearly ideal non-mathematical and isotropic fractal objects.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 351
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two Dimensions of Subjective Uncertainty: Clues From Natural Language
    Uelkuemen, Guelden
    Fox, Craig R.
    Malle, Bertram F.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2016, 145 (10) : 1280 - 1297
  • [22] Networks with fourfold connectivity in two dimensions
    Tessier, F
    Boal, DH
    Discher, DE
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2003, 67 (01):
  • [23] Irregularity detection from noisy data in one and two dimensions
    Rossini, M
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 1997, 16 (3-4) : 283 - 301
  • [24] Nonthermal States Arising from Confinement in One and Two Dimensions
    James, Andrew J. A.
    Konik, Robert M.
    Robinson, Neil J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2019, 122 (13)
  • [25] Irregularity detection from noisy data in one and two dimensions
    Milvia Rossini
    Numerical Algorithms, 1997, 16 : 283 - 301
  • [26] Dependence of excited-state properties of tellurium on dimensionality: From bulk to two dimensions to one dimensions
    Pan, Yuanyuan
    Gao, Shiyuan
    Yang, Li
    Lu, Jing
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2018, 98 (08)
  • [27] Cluster Monte Carlo dynamics for the Ising model on fractal structures in dimensions between one and two
    Monceau, P
    Hsiao, PY
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2003, 32 (01): : 81 - 86
  • [28] Cluster Monte Carlo dynamics for the Ising model on fractal structures in dimensions between one and two
    P. Monceau
    P.-Y. Hsiao
    The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 2003, 32 : 81 - 86
  • [29] Fractal dimensions of aggregates from shear devices
    Qing, JA
    Logan, BE
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1996, 88 (02): : 100 - 113
  • [30] Diluted networks of nonlinear resistors and fractal dimensions of percolation clusters
    Janssen, H.K.
    Stenull, O.
    Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2000, 61 (05): : 4821 - 4834