Behaviour moderates the impacts of food-web structure on species coexistence

被引:6
|
作者
Ho, Hsi-Cheng [1 ]
Tylianakis, Jason M. [2 ]
Pawar, Samraat [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, Silwood Pk Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Univ Canterbury, Sch Biol Sci, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
Body‐ size structure; ecological metabolic theory; equilibrium feasibility; food web; food‐ web structure; foraging behaviour; foraging dimensionality; foraging strategy; network topology; species coexistence; BODY-SIZE; INTERACTION STRENGTHS; STABILITY; COMMUNITY; ARCHITECTURE; CONSTRAINTS; COMPETITION; PRINCIPLES; PATTERNS; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1111/ele.13643
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
How species coexistence (mathematical 'feasibility') in food webs emerges from species' trophic interactions remains a long-standing open question. Here we investigate how structure (network topology and body-size structure) and behaviour (foraging strategy and spatial dimensionality of interactions) interactively affect feasibility in food webs. Metabolically-constrained modelling of food-web dynamics based on whole-organism consumption revealed that feasibility is promoted in systems dominated by large-eat-small foraging (consumers eating smaller resources) whenever (1) many top consumers are present, (2) grazing or sit-and-wait foraging strategies are common, and (3) species engage in two-dimensional interactions. Congruently, the first two conditions were associated with dominance of large-eat-small foraging in 74 well-resolved (primarily aquatic) real-world food webs. Our findings provide a new, mechanistic understanding of how behavioural properties can modulate the effects of structural properties on species coexistence in food webs, and suggest that 'being feasible' constrains the spectra of behavioural and structural properties seen in natural food webs.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 309
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interactive effects of warming, eutrophication and size structure: impacts on biodiversity and food-web structure
    Binzer, Amrei
    Guill, Christian
    Rall, Bjoern C.
    Brose, Ulrich
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (01) : 220 - 227
  • [2] Complex behaviour in four species food-web model
    Gakkhar, S.
    Priyadarshi, A.
    Banerjee, Sandip
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 6 (02) : 440 - 456
  • [3] Major dimensions in food-web structure properties
    Vermaat, Jan E.
    Dunne, Jennifer A.
    Gilbert, Alison J.
    ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (01) : 278 - 282
  • [4] Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence
    Stouffer, Daniel B.
    Bascompte, Jordi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (09) : 3648 - 3652
  • [5] Species richness and food-web structure jointly drive community biomass and its temporal stability in fish communities
    Danet, Alain
    Mouchet, Maud
    Bonnaffe, Willem
    Thebault, Elisa
    Fontaine, Colin
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 24 (11) : 2364 - 2377
  • [6] Predator foraging behaviour drives food-web topological structure
    Lazzaro, Xavier
    Lacroix, Gerard
    Gauzens, Benoit
    Gignoux, Jacques
    Legendre, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 78 (06) : 1307 - 1317
  • [7] Resolving Food-Web Structure
    Pringle, Robert M.
    Hutchinson, Matthew C.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 51, 2020, 2020, 51 : 55 - 80
  • [8] Predation risk influences food-web structure by constraining species diet choice
    Ho, Hsi-Cheng
    Tylianakis, Jason M.
    Zheng, Jonathan X.
    Pawar, Samraat
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 22 (11) : 1734 - 1745
  • [9] From projected species distribution to food-web structure under climate change
    Albouy, Camille
    Velez, Laure
    Coll, Marta
    Colloca, Francesco
    Le Loc'h, Francois
    Mouillot, David
    Gravel, Dominique
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (03) : 730 - 741
  • [10] PARASITES AND FOOD-WEB PATTERNS
    HUXHAM, M
    RAFFAELLI, D
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1995, 64 (02) : 168 - 176