PillCam® SB3 capsule: Does the increased frame rate eliminate the risk of missing lesions?

被引:28
作者
Monteiro, Sara [1 ]
de Castro, Francisca Dias [1 ]
Carvalho, Pedro Boal [1 ]
Moreira, Maria Joao [1 ]
Rosa, Bruno [1 ]
Cotter, Jose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Senhora de Oliveira, Dept Gastroenterol, Rua Cutileiros, P-4835044 Creixomil, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Sch Hlth Sci, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst ICVS, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
[3] PT Govt Associate Lab, ICVS 3Bs, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
关键词
PillCam (R) SB2; PillCam (R) SB3; Capsule endoscopy; Diagnostic yield; Lesions; Frames; SMALL-BOWEL PATHOLOGY; ENDOSCOPY;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3066
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Since its emergence in 2000, small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has assumed a pivotal role as an investigation method for small bowel diseases. The PillCam (R) SB2-ex offers 12 h of battery time, 4 more than the previous version (SB2). Rahman et al recently found that the PillCam (R) SB2-ex has a significantly increased completion rate, although without higher diagnostic yield, compared with the SB2. We would like to discuss these somewhat surprising results and the new potentialities of the PillCam (R) SB3 regarding the diagnostic yield of small bowel studies. PillCam (R) SB3 offers improved image resolution and faster adaptable frame rate over previous versions of SBCE. We recently compared the major duodenal papilla detection rate obtained with PillCam (R) SB3 and SB2 as a surrogate indicator of diagnostic yield in the proximal small bowel. The PillCam (R) SB3 had a significantly higher major duodenal papilla detection rate than the PillCam (R) SB2 (42.7% vs 24%, P = 0.015). Thus, the most recent version of the PillCam (R) capsule, SB3, may increase diagnostic yield, particularly in the proximal segments of the small bowel.
引用
收藏
页码:3066 / 3068
页数:3
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Is half-knowledge worse than ignorance? [J].
Cass, Oliver W. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (04) :542-543
[2]   Clinically significant small-bowel pathology identified by double-balloon enteroscopy but missed by capsule endoscopy [J].
Chong, Andre K. H. ;
Chin, Bernard W. K. ;
Meredith, Christopher G. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (03) :445-449
[3]   Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: A ten-point contemporary review [J].
Koulaouzidis, Anastasios ;
Rondonotti, Emanuele ;
Karargyris, Alexandros .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (24) :3726-3746
[4]  
Monteiro S, 2015, 13 REUN IB CAPS END, P13
[5]   Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy [J].
Postgate, Aymer ;
Despott, Edward ;
Burling, David ;
Gupta, Arun ;
Phillips, Robin ;
O'Beirne, James ;
Patch, David ;
Fraser, Chris .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (06) :1209-1214
[6]   Comparison of the diagnostic yield and outcomes between standard 8 h capsule endoscopy and the new 12 h capsule endoscopy for investigating small bowel pathology [J].
Rahman, Merajur ;
Akerman, Stuart ;
DeVito, Bethany ;
Miller, Larry ;
Akerman, Meredith ;
Sultan, Keith .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (18) :5542-5547
[7]   Video capsule endoscopy compared with standard endoscopy for the evaluation of small-bowel polyps in persons with familial adenomatous polyposis (with video) [J].
Wong, Robert F. ;
Tuteja, Ashok K. ;
Haslem, Derrick S. ;
Pappas, Lisa ;
Szabo, Aniko ;
Ogara, Maydeen M. ;
DiSario, James A. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (04) :530-537