Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review

被引:288
作者
Johnston, Robert A. [1 ]
Edmonds, Andrew J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Dept Psychol, Canterbury CT2 7NP, Kent, England
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Nottingham, England
关键词
Familiar face recognition; Unfamiliar face recognition; Face perception; Learning; Review; RECOGNIZING MOVING FACES; GEOMETRIC DISTORTIONS; LIGHTING DIRECTION; MATCHING FAMILIAR; FEATURE SALIENCY; UNIFIED ACCOUNT; INFORMATION; INVERSION; IDENTITY; DISTINCTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1080/09658210902976969
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Since the 1970s there has been a continuing interest in how people recognise familiar faces (Bruce, 1979; Ellis, 1975). This work has complemented investigations of how unfamiliar faces are processed and the findings from these two strands of research have given rise to accounts that propose qualitatively different forms of representation for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Evidence to suggest that we process familiar and unfamiliar faces in different ways is available from cognitive neuropsychology, brain scanning, and psychophysics. However, in this review we focus on the evidence, available from experimental investigations of how people recognise faces, for different types of representation existing for each type of face. Factors affecting recognition are evaluated in terms of how they apply to familiar and unfamiliar faces and categorised according to the nature of their impact. In the final section this evidence, along with recent advances in the field, is used to explore the way in which unfamiliar faces may become familiar and the factors that may be important for the development of familiar face representations.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 596
页数:20
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]   TYPICALITY AND FAMILIARITY OF FACES [J].
BARTLETT, JC ;
HURRY, S ;
THORLEY, W .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1984, 12 (03) :219-228
[2]   AUTONOMIC RECOGNITION OF NAMES AND FACES IN PROSOPAGNOSIA - A NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL APPLICATION OF THE GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST [J].
BAUER, RM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1984, 22 (04) :457-469
[3]  
BENSON P J, 1991, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, V3, P105, DOI 10.1080/09541449108406222
[4]   VISUAL PROCESSING OF FACIAL DISTINCTIVENESS [J].
BENSON, PJ ;
PERRETT, DI .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (01) :75-93
[5]   Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms [J].
Bentin, S ;
Deouell, LY .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :35-54
[6]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[7]   PROSOPAGNOSIA AND FACIAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BENTON, AL ;
VANALLEN, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1972, 15 (02) :167-&
[8]   Brain potential correlates of face recognition: Geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions [J].
Bindemann, Markus ;
Burton, A. Mike ;
Leuthold, Hartmut ;
Schweinberger, Stefan R. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 45 (04) :535-544
[9]   7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: Evidence against a developmental shift [J].
Bonner, L ;
Burton, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (06) :1019-1029
[10]   Getting to know you: How we learn new faces [J].
Bonner, L ;
Burton, AM ;
Bruce, V .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2003, 10 (05) :527-536