Understanding of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Authorship Criteria Among Faculty Members of Pharmacy and Other Health Sciences in Jordan

被引:11
作者
Alshogran, Osama Y. [1 ]
Al-Delaimy, Wael K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Clin Pharm, Irbid, Jordan
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Epidemiol & Global Hlth, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
research ethics; authorship; ICMJE criteria; health sciences; Jordan; RESEARCHERS; VIEWS; PUBLICATIONS; MISCONDUCT;
D O I
10.1177/1556264618764575
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Authorship represents a critical element of scientific research. This study evaluated the perceptions, attitudes, and practices of Jordanian researchers toward the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to health sciences faculty (n = 986), with 272 participants completing the questionnaire. Only 27.2% reported awareness of ICMJE guidelines, yet, 76.8% agreed that all ICMJE criteria must be met for authorship, and 55.9% believed that it is easy to apply the guidelines. Unethical authorship practices were reported by 16.5% to 31.3% of participants. A majority (73%) agreed that violation of authorship criteria is scientific misconduct. Well-defined criteria for authorship need to be disseminated and emphasized in less developed countries through training to avoid authorship disputes and unethical conduct.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 284
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Authorship conflict in Bangladesh: an exploratory study
    Ahmed, Hasan Shareef
    Hadi, Abdullahel
    Choudhury, Nuzhat
    [J]. LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2010, 23 (04) : 319 - 325
  • [2] Credit where credit is due
    Allen, Liz
    Brand, Amy
    Scott, Jo
    Altman, Micah
    Hlava, Marjorie
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 508 (7496) : 312 - 313
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, DEF ROL AUTH CONTR
  • [4] The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty
    Bhopal, R
    Rankin, J
    McColl, E
    Thomas, L
    Kaner, E
    Stacy, R
    Pearson, P
    Vernon, B
    Rodgers, H
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7086) : 1009 - 1012
  • [5] Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011, COD COND BEST PRACT
  • [6] Dhaliwal Upreet, 2006, MedGenMed, V8, P52
  • [7] Mythbusting Medical Writing: Goodbye, Ghosts! Hello, Help!
    Hamilton, Cindy W.
    Gertel, Art
    Jacobs, Adam
    Marchington, Jackie
    Weaver, Shelley
    Woolley, Karen
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2016, 23 (03): : 178 - 194
  • [8] Avoid Ethical Misconduct in Manuscript Preparation
    Hicks, Rodney W.
    Harris, Ruth
    [J]. ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2016, 38 (01) : 69 - 80
  • [9] Scientific Dishonesty: A Survey of Doctoral Students at the Major Medical Faculties in Sweden and Norway
    Hofmann, Bjorn
    Helgesson, Gert
    Juth, Niklas
    Holm, Soren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (04) : 380 - 388
  • [10] Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria:: Analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in Radiology
    Hwang, SS
    Song, HH
    Baik, JH
    Jung, SL
    Park, SH
    Choi, KH
    Park, YH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 16 - 23