The Queensland cancer risk study: general population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

被引:54
作者
Janda, Monika [1 ,2 ]
DiSipio, Tracey [1 ]
Hurst, Cameron [1 ]
Cella, David [3 ]
Newman, Beth [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Canc Council Queensland, Viertel Ctr Res Canc Control, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
reference values; normative data; quality of life; cancer; oncology; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY; EORTC QLQ-C30; VALIDATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCORES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1428
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To derive Australian normative scores for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Population (FACT-GP) and to confirm its factor structure. Methods: Quality of life (QoL) data (as measured by the FACT-GP) were collected within the Queensland Cancer Risk Study (QCRS) in 2004. The QCRS explored cancer screening and cancer risk behaviours among 9419 English-speaking residents of Queensland aged 20-75 years. Information was collected through computer-assisted telephone interviews and augmented by mailed, Self-Administered Questionnaires (SAQ). A total of 2727 participants largely comparable to the general population of Queensland self-completed the FACT-GP; however, participants were somewhat higher educated, more likely to have had cancer and less likely to be of indigenous heritage. Results: The Queensland population reported a FACT-GP summary score of 85.9 (SD = 15.1), with subscale scores (range: 19.2 for social well-being to 25.1. for physical wellbeing (PWB)). In this study, men and women within different age groups reported similar QoL. QoL was clinically and significantly lower among participants not married, with a body mass index (BMI) deviating from normal weight and with one or more self-reported morbidities. A four-factor solution was confirmed with good goodness-of-fit indices (RSMEA < 0.05 for all three age groups). Conclusions: The reference values from the general population reported here can be used for comparison with the QoL measured in populations of cancer patients, providing a benchmark against which clinicians can evaluate the impact of the disease and/or the treatments on QoL. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 614
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   General population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) [J].
Butt, Zeeshan ;
Peipert, John ;
Webster, Kimberly ;
Chen, Connie ;
Cella, David .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (02) :429-437
[22]   Reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) [J].
Smith, Adam B. ;
Cocks, Kim ;
Parry, David ;
Taylor, Matthew .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (03) :971-976
[23]   The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study [J].
McTaggart-Cowan, Helen ;
King, Madeleine T. ;
Norman, Richard ;
Costa, Daniel S. J. ;
Pickard, A. Simon ;
Viney, Rosalie ;
Peacock, Stuart J. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
[24]   The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study [J].
Helen McTaggart-Cowan ;
Madeleine T. King ;
Richard Norman ;
Daniel S. J. Costa ;
A. Simon Pickard ;
Rosalie Viney ;
Stuart J. Peacock .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20
[25]   Which quality of life instruments are preferred by cancer patients in Japan? Comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [J].
Sato, Kazuki ;
Shimizu, Megumi ;
Miyashita, Mitsunori .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (12) :3135-3141
[26]   Mapping the English and Chinese Versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to the EQ-5D Utility Index [J].
Cheung, Yin-Bun ;
Thumboo, Julian ;
Gao, Fei ;
Ng, Gim-Yew ;
Pang, Grace ;
Koo, Wen-Hsin ;
Sethi, Vijay-Kumar ;
Wee, Joseph ;
Goh, Cynthia .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (02) :371-376
[27]   General Population Norms for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale [J].
Montan, Inka ;
Loewe, Bernd ;
Cella, David ;
Mehnert, Anja ;
Hinz, Andreas .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (11) :1313-1321
[28]   Reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) [J].
Adam B. Smith ;
Kim Cocks ;
David Parry ;
Matthew Taylor .
Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 :971-976
[29]   The impact of clinical and sociodemographic features on quality of life in patients with early stage cancers using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General assessment tool [J].
Popovic, Marko ;
Lao, Nicholas ;
Zeng, Liang ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Cella, David ;
Beaumont, Jennifer L. ;
Chow, Ronald ;
Chiu, Nicholas ;
Chiu, Leonard ;
Lam, Henry ;
Poon, Michael ;
Chow, Edward .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (08) :2267-2277
[30]   Measuring the Quality of Life among Head-and/or-Neck Cancer Patients with Oral Mucositis Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General in Jordan [J].
Al Barmawi, Marwa ;
Al Hadid, Lourance A. ;
Alqudah, Hani Nawaf ;
Al Hadid, Wasfi A. ;
Shamoun, Shaimaa A. .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 5 (03) :320-326