Reflectance confocal microscopy vs. standardized skin surface biopsy for measuring the density of Demodex mites

被引:27
|
作者
Erdemir, A. Turgut [1 ]
Gurel, M. S. [1 ]
Aksu, A. E. Koku [1 ]
Karahalli, F. Bilgin [1 ]
Incel, P. [1 ]
Haytoglu, N. S. Kutlu [1 ]
Falay, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
confocal microscopy; Demodex mites; demodicosis; standardized skin surface biopsy; IN-VIVO DETECTION; FOLLICULORUM; ROSACEA; DERMATOLOGY; DERMATITIS; HISTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/srt.12137
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundReflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been recently shown to be effective for measuring the Demodex mite density. ObjectivesTo compare and demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) and RCM for measuring the density of Demodex mites. Materials and methodsForty-eight patients (30 female, 18 male) and 47 healthy controls (30 female, 17 male) were enrolled in the study. The patients diagnoses were pityriasis folliculorum (n=40), papulopustulary rosecea (n=7) and erythema-telengiectatic rosacea (n=1). The area with the most intense erythema on the right cheek was selected for imaging with RCM (VivaScope 3000) and SSSB. ResultsForty-two patients demonstrated high Demodex density [(Dd)>5mites/cm(2)] with SSSB (85.7%). RCM identified demodicosis in 48 patients (100%). The mean Dd measured with RCM (409.8209.2) was significantly higher than SSSB (15.33 +/- 18.1) (P<0.001). In the patients, RCM demonstrated the mean number of mites 40.90 +/- 20.9 and 4.11 +/- 6.4 in the controls per 10mm(2) area. The corresponding mean number of 2.63 +/- 0.77 mites was detected in the infested follicles per area of view compared to a mean of 0.77 +/- 0.98 mites in the infested follicles in the controls (P<0.001). ConclusionReflectance confocal microscopy is a fast, direct and noninvasive method for Demodex-associated diseases and it is superior to SSSB for Demodex mite detection.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 439
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Comparison of UV-induced skin changes in sun-exposed vs. sun-protected skin- preliminary evaluation by reflectance confocal microscopy
    Ulrich, M.
    Rueter, C.
    Astner, S.
    Sterry, W.
    Lange-Asschenfeldt, B.
    Stockfleth, E.
    Roewert-Huber, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 : 46 - 53
  • [22] A COMPARISON OF STANDARDIZED SKIN SURFACE BIOPSY VS DIRECT MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION ON DIAGNOSIS OF DEMODICOSIS
    Kim, Jihoon
    Ryu, Haryeong
    Yoon, Chulhyun
    Choi, Joonseok
    Baek, Jinok
    Roh, Jooyoung
    Lee, Jongrok
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 : 17 - 17
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of confocal microscopy imaging vs. punch biopsy for diagnosing and subtyping basal cell carcinoma
    Kadouch, D. J.
    Leeflang, M. M.
    Elshot, Y. S.
    Longo, C.
    Ulrich, M.
    van der Wal, A. C.
    Wolkerstorfer, A.
    Bekkenk, M. W.
    de Rie, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2017, 31 (10) : 1641 - 1648
  • [24] In vivo quantification of epidermal pigmentation and dermis papilla density with reflectance confocal microscopy: variations with age and skin phototype
    Garrido-Lagarrigue, S.
    George, J.
    Questel, E.
    Lauze, C.
    Meyer, N.
    Lagarde, J. M.
    Simon, M.
    Schmitt, A. M.
    Serre, G.
    Paul, C.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 21 (09) : E3 - E3
  • [25] In vivo quantification of epidermis pigmentation and dermis papilla density with reflectance confocal microscopy: variations with age and skin phototype
    Lagarrigue, Sophie Garrido
    George, Jerome
    Questel, Emmanuel
    Lauze, Christophe
    Meyer, Nicolas
    Lagarde, Jean-Michel
    Simon, Michel
    Schmitt, Anne-Marie
    Serre, Guy
    Paul, Carle
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 21 (04) : 281 - 286
  • [26] Which factors influence Demodex mite density in standardized superficial skin biopsy in patients with rosacea? A prospective cross-sectional analysis
    Cetinkaya, Pinar Ozdemir
    Kurt, Birgul Ozkesici
    Altunay, Ilknur Kivanc
    Cerman, Asli Aksu
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (06)
  • [27] Microscopic heterogeneity vs. macroscopic homogeneity in tissue phantoms using reflectance-mode confocal scanning laser microscopy
    Samatham, Ravikant
    Levitz, David
    Fletcher, Reid
    Fu, Yongji
    Jacques, Steven L.
    DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE VALIDATION OF PHANTOMS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS OF TISSUE, 2008, 6870
  • [28] Two Consecutive Standardized Skin Surface Biopsies: An Improved Sampling Method to Evaluate Demodex Density as a Diagnostic Tool for Rosacea and Demodicosis
    Forton, Fabienne M. N.
    De Maertelaer, Viviane
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2017, 97 (02) : 242 - 248
  • [29] Density and diameter of dermal papillae from three different anatomical areas in normal skin using reflectance confocal microscopy
    Verzi, Anna Elisa
    Lacarrubba, Francesco
    Dall'Oglio, Federica
    Puglisi, Davide
    Micali, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2023, 37 (10) : E1248 - E1250
  • [30] Planning slow Mohs excision margins for lentigo maligna: comparison of reflectance confocal microscopy margin mapping vs. visual inspection with dermoscopy
    Gao, J. M.
    Garioch, J.
    Fadhil, M.
    Moncrieff, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 181 : 107 - 108