Reflectance confocal microscopy vs. standardized skin surface biopsy for measuring the density of Demodex mites

被引:27
|
作者
Erdemir, A. Turgut [1 ]
Gurel, M. S. [1 ]
Aksu, A. E. Koku [1 ]
Karahalli, F. Bilgin [1 ]
Incel, P. [1 ]
Haytoglu, N. S. Kutlu [1 ]
Falay, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
confocal microscopy; Demodex mites; demodicosis; standardized skin surface biopsy; IN-VIVO DETECTION; FOLLICULORUM; ROSACEA; DERMATOLOGY; DERMATITIS; HISTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/srt.12137
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundReflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has been recently shown to be effective for measuring the Demodex mite density. ObjectivesTo compare and demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) and RCM for measuring the density of Demodex mites. Materials and methodsForty-eight patients (30 female, 18 male) and 47 healthy controls (30 female, 17 male) were enrolled in the study. The patients diagnoses were pityriasis folliculorum (n=40), papulopustulary rosecea (n=7) and erythema-telengiectatic rosacea (n=1). The area with the most intense erythema on the right cheek was selected for imaging with RCM (VivaScope 3000) and SSSB. ResultsForty-two patients demonstrated high Demodex density [(Dd)>5mites/cm(2)] with SSSB (85.7%). RCM identified demodicosis in 48 patients (100%). The mean Dd measured with RCM (409.8209.2) was significantly higher than SSSB (15.33 +/- 18.1) (P<0.001). In the patients, RCM demonstrated the mean number of mites 40.90 +/- 20.9 and 4.11 +/- 6.4 in the controls per 10mm(2) area. The corresponding mean number of 2.63 +/- 0.77 mites was detected in the infested follicles per area of view compared to a mean of 0.77 +/- 0.98 mites in the infested follicles in the controls (P<0.001). ConclusionReflectance confocal microscopy is a fast, direct and noninvasive method for Demodex-associated diseases and it is superior to SSSB for Demodex mite detection.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 439
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The value of reflectance confocal microscopy in detection of Demodex mites
    Harmelin, Y.
    Le Duff, F.
    Passeron, T.
    Lacour, J. -P.
    Bahadoran, P.
    ANNALES DE DERMATOLOGIE ET DE VENEREOLOGIE, 2017, 144 (6-7): : 459 - 461
  • [2] Reflectance confocal microscopy for monitoring the density of Demodex mites in patients with rosacea before and after treatment
    Sattler, E. C.
    Hoffmann, V. S.
    Ruzicka, T.
    Braunmuehl, T. V.
    Berking, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 173 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [3] EFLECTANCE CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY FOR MEASURING DEMODEX DENSITY
    Vremera, Teodora
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2014, 118 (02): : 470 - 470
  • [4] Tips and tricks on Demodex density examination by standardized skin surface biopsy
    Aytekin, S.
    Goktay, F.
    Yasar, S.
    Gizlenti, S.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2016, 30 (11) : E126 - E128
  • [5] Comparison of reflectance confocal microscopy and standardized skin surface biopsy for three different lesions in a pityriasis folliculorum patient
    Yuan, C.
    Wang, X. -M.
    Guichard, A.
    Lihoreau, T.
    Mac-Mary, S.
    Khyat, L.
    Ardigo, M.
    Humbert, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (05) : 1440 - 1442
  • [7] Fluorescence-advanced videodermatoscopy characterization of demodex mites: a comparison with reflectance confocal microscopy
    Fernandez-Nieto, D.
    Segurado-Miravalles, G.
    Gonzalez-Cantero, A.
    Ortega-Quijano, D.
    Jimenez-Cauhe, J.
    Boixeda, P.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : E215 - E216
  • [8] Standardized skin surface biopsy:: method to estimate the Demodex folliculorum density, not to study the Demodex folliculorum prevalence -: Response to Forton
    Okyay, P.
    Ertabaklar, H.
    Savk, E.
    Ertug, S.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2007, 21 (09) : 1302 - 1302
  • [9] Limitations of standardized skin surface biopsy in measurement of the density of Demodex folliculorum. A case report
    Forton, F
    Song, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 139 (04) : 697 - 700
  • [10] Which method is better for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: biopsy vs. reflectance confocal microscopy?
    Patalay, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 184 (04) : 590 - 590