Ethonomics - The ethics of the unaffordable

被引:13
作者
Little, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Ctr Values Eth & Law Med, Dept Surg, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.135.1.17
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The most familiar basis for medical ethics since the 1950s has been principle-based ethics. The 4 basic principles are known as the "Georgetown mantra" of beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. These principles have served us well since their enunciation in the wake of the activities of the Nazi doctors in the concentracion and extermination camps of World War II. In the past 15 years, however, they have begun to serve less well. In the era of resource constraints, however, the clinical relationship has become more complex. It now involves many more stakeholders, who control funds, make policy, and effectively ration services. Lawyers are also involved in important ways. All these people take part with varying directness in the processes of consultation and treatment. The consulting room has become a crowded office. For these reasons, the old ethics will no longer serve us. We need a new ethics that recognizes the involvement of the new stakeholders, and recognizes that resource constraints influence clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 21
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alexy Robert, 1990, The Communicative Ethics Controversy, P151
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROBLEMS PATIENTS MA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, COMMUNICATIVE ETHICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1978, CONCEPT MIND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PALLIATIVE CARE ETHI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TOO MUCH MED BUSINES
[7]  
Beauchamp T., 1989, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[8]  
BROYARD A, 1992, INTOXICATED ILLNESS
[9]  
DEVLIN K, 1997, LANGUAGE WORK ANAL C
[10]  
DEVLIN K, 1997, GOODBYE DESCARTES EN