Biological meshes for abdominal hernia: Lack of evidence-based recommendations for clinical use

被引:16
|
作者
Trippoli, Sabrina [1 ]
Caccese, Erminia [1 ]
Tulli, Giorgio [2 ]
Ipponi, Pierluigi [3 ]
Marinai, Claudio [1 ]
Messori, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] ESTAR, HTA Unit, Reg Hlth Serv, I-50135 Florence, Italy
[2] Reg Hlth Agcy, Florence, Italy
[3] Surg Unit, Florence, Italy
关键词
Abdominal surgery; Biological meshes; Synthetic meshes; Post-surgical infection; Post-surgical recurrence; Meta-analysis; WALL RECONSTRUCTION; TERM OUTCOMES; REPAIR; PERMACOL(TM); MATRIX; REINFORCEMENT; METAANALYSIS; DEFECTS; IMPLANT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the clinical literature on abdominal hernia repair, no sound criteria have been established to support the use of biological meshes as opposed to synthetic ones. Furthermore, the information on biological meshes is quite scarce, and so their place in therapy has not yet been defined. Methods: The treatment of primary and incisional ventral hernia was the target intervention evaluated in our analysis. Our study consisted of the following phases: a) Identification of the biologic meshes available on the market; b) Literature search focused on efficacy and safety of these meshes; c) Analysis of the findings derived from the literature search. The information collected this way was reviewed narratively, and presented according to standard meta-analysis. The main end-points of our analysis included infection of surgical wound at 1 month and recurrence at 12 months. Results: Our clinical literature comprised 11 trials that evaluated 5 biological meshes: Permacol (706 patients), Strattice (324 patients), Surgisis (44 patients), Tutomesh (38 patients) and Xenmatrix (22 patients). These studies generally showed a poor methodological quality. Surgical wound infection showed a wide between-study variability (95% CI: from 12.0% to 22.9%). Also the 12-month relapse rate demonstrated a wide 95% CI (from 5.0% to 19.9%). A significantly lower rate of recurrence at 12 months was found for Permacol compared with Strattice (rate difference: -14.2%; 95% CI: -22.1% to -6.2%). Discussion: Our analysis provided an overview of 5 biological meshes currently available on the market. The different types of meshes showed a marked statistical variability in the clinical outcomes. Hence, nearly all comparisons between different meshes in the two clinical end-points did not reach statistical significance. One exception was represented by the finding that cross-linked meshes had a significantly lower recurrence rate at 12 months than non-cross-linked meshes.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 292
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological meshes: A review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs
    Smart, Neil J.
    Marshall, Morwena
    Daniels, Ian R.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2012, 10 (03): : 159 - 171
  • [2] Evidence-Based Hernia Treatment in Adults
    Berger, Dieter
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 113 (09): : 150 - +
  • [3] Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Recommendations from Evidence-Based Medicine
    Shi, Hekai
    Wang, Rui
    Dong, Wenpei
    Yang, Dongchao
    Song, Heng
    Gu, Yan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (10) : 2416 - 2424
  • [4] Evidence-based recommendations for teaching writing
    Graham, Steve
    Collins, Alyson A.
    Ciullo, Stephen
    EDUCATION 3-13, 2024, 52 (07) : 979 - 992
  • [5] Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring
    Tomczak, David L.
    Lanzo, Lauren A.
    Aguinis, Herman
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2018, 61 (02) : 251 - 259
  • [6] Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated fields
    Cavallaro, Andrea
    Lo Menzo, Emanuele
    Di Vita, Maria
    Zanghi, Antonio
    Cavallaro, Vincenzo
    Veroux, Pier Francesco
    Cappellani, Alessandro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (15) : 1928 - 1933
  • [7] Consensus in ERAS protocols for ventral hernia repair: evidence-based recommendations from the ACHQC QI Committee
    Remulla, Daphne
    Bradley III, Joel F.
    Henderson, Winnie
    Lewis, Ronald C.
    Kreuz, Bridgette
    Beffa, Lucas R.
    HERNIA, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [8] Evidence-based clinical recommendations regarding screening for oral squamous cell carcinomas
    Rethman, Michael P.
    Carpenter, William
    Cohen, Ezra E. W.
    Epstein, Joel
    Evans, Caswell A.
    Flaitz, Catherine M.
    Graham, Frank J.
    Hujoel, Philippe P.
    Kalmar, John R.
    Koch, Wayne M.
    Lambert, Paul M.
    Lingen, Mark W.
    Oettmeier, Bert W., Jr.
    Patton, Lauren L.
    Perkins, David
    Reid, Britt C.
    Sciubba, James J.
    Tomar, Scott L.
    Wyatt, Alfred D., Jr.
    Aravamudhan, Krishna
    Frantsve-Hawley, Julie
    Cleveland, Jennifer L.
    Meyer, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 141 (05) : 509 - 520
  • [9] Classification and Clinical Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Recommendations of Recent Evidence-Based Interdisciplinary Guidelines
    Fitzcharles, Mary-Ann
    Shir, Yoram
    Ablin, Jacob N.
    Buskila, Dan
    Amital, Howard
    Henningsen, Peter
    Haeuser, Winfried
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 2013
  • [10] Lack of association between inguinal hernia and abdominal aortic aneurysm in a population-based male cohort
    Henriksen, N. A.
    Sorensen, L. T.
    Jorgensen, L. N.
    Lindholt, J. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (11) : 1478 - 1482