A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists

被引:147
作者
Neuschler, Erin I. [1 ]
Butler, Reni [2 ]
Young, Catherine A. [3 ]
Barke, Lora D. [4 ]
Bertrand, Margaret L. [5 ]
Bohm-Velez, Marcela [6 ]
Destounis, Stamatia [7 ]
Donlan, Pamela [8 ]
Grobmyer, Stephen R. [9 ]
Katzen, Janine [10 ]
Kist, Kenneth A. [11 ]
Lavin, Philip T. [12 ]
Makariou, Erini V. [13 ]
Parris, Tchaiko M. [14 ]
Schilling, Kathy J. [15 ]
Tucker, F. Lee [16 ]
Dogan, Basak E. [17 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, POB 208042, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Radiol Imaging Associates Invis Sally Jobe, Englewood, CO USA
[5] Solis Mammog Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[6] Weinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, Rochester, NY USA
[8] Breast Care Atlanta, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[11] UT Hlth San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[12] Boston Biostat Res Fdn, Framingham, MA USA
[13] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
[14] Breastlink Temecula Valley, Murrieta, CA USA
[15] Boca Raton Reg Hosp, Boca Raton, FL USA
[16] Virginia Biomed Labs LLC, Wirtz, VA USA
[17] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
DIFFUSE OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; US; METAANALYSIS; ULTRASOUND; CANCER; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2017172228
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic utility of an investigational optoacoustic imaging device that fuses laser optical imaging (OA) with grayscale ultrasonography (US) to grayscale US alone in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. Materials and Methods: This prospective, 16-site study of 2105 women (study period: 12/21/2012 to 9/9/2015) compared Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories assigned by seven blinded independent readers to benign and malignant breast masses using OA/US versus US alone. BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 masses assessed at diagnostic US with biopsy-proven histologic findings and BI-RADS 3 masses stable at 12 months were eligible. Independent readers reviewed US images obtained with the OA/US device, assigned a probability of malignancy (POM) and BI-RADS category, and locked results. The same independent readers then reviewed OA/US images, scored OA features, and assigned OA/US POM and a BI-RADS category. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for US and OA/US. Benign and malignant mass upgrade and downgrade rates, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were compared. Results: Of 2105 consented subjects with 2191 masses, 100 subjects (103 masses) were analyzed separately as a training population and excluded. An additional 202 subjects (210 masses) were excluded due to technical failures or incomplete imaging, 72 subjects (78 masses) due to protocol deviations, and 41 subjects (43 masses) due to high-risk histologic results. Of 1690 subjects with 1757 masses (1079 [61.4%] benign and 678 [38.6%] malignant masses), OA/US downgraded 40.8% (3078/7535) of benign mass reads, with a specificity of 43.0% (3242/7538, 99% confidence interval [CI]: 40.4%, 45.7%) for OA/US versus 28.1% (2120/7543, 99% CI: 25.8%, 30.5%) for the internal US of the OA/US device. OA/US exceeded US in specificity by 14.9% (P<.0001; 99% CI: 12.9, 16.9%). Sensitivity for biopsied malignant masses was 96.0% (4553/4745, 99% CI: 94.5%, 97.0%) for OA/US and 98.6% (4680/4746, 99% CI: 97.8%, 99.1%) for US (P<.0001). The negative likelihood ratio of 0.094 for OA/US indicates a negative examination can reduce a maximum US-assigned pretest probability of 17.8% (low BI-RADS 4B) to a posttest probability of 2% (BI-RADS 3). Conclusion: OA/US increases the specificity of breast mass assessment compared with the device internal grayscale US alone. Online supplemental material is available for this article. (C) RSNA, 2017
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 412
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Cosgrove, David O. ;
Dore, Caroline J. ;
Schaefer, Fritz K. W. ;
Svensson, William E. ;
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Ohlinger, Ralf ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Balu-Maestro, Catherine ;
Locatelli, Martina ;
Tourasse, Christophe ;
Cavanaugh, Barbara C. ;
Juhan, Valerie ;
Stavros, A. Thomas ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Gay, Joel ;
Henry, Jean-Pierre ;
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (02) :435-449
[2]  
Bruening W, 2012, NONINVASIVE DIAGNOST
[3]  
Butler R, 2015, OPTO ACOUSTIC BREAST
[4]   US-GUIDED OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY: CORRELATION WITH CLINICOPATHOLOGIC VARIABLES IN BREAST CANCER [J].
Choi, Ji Soo ;
Kim, Min Jung ;
Youk, Ji Hyun ;
Moon, Hee Jung ;
Suh, Hee Jung ;
Kim, Eun-Kyung .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) :233-240
[5]  
Cicchetti D. V., 1994, Psychol Assessment, V6, P284, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
[6]   Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer [J].
Ermilov, Sergey A. ;
Khamapirad, Tuenchit ;
Conjusteau, Andre ;
Leonard, Morton H. ;
Lacewell, Ron ;
Mehta, Ketan ;
Miller, Tom ;
Oraevsky, Alexander A. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2009, 14 (02)
[7]   Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis [J].
Gong, Xia ;
Xu, Qiuhua ;
Xu, Zhengliang ;
Xiong, Ping ;
Yan, Weili ;
Chen, Yazhu .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 130 (01) :11-18
[8]   Radiation Doses and Cancer Risks from Breast Imaging Studies [J].
Hendrick, R. Edward .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (01) :246-253
[9]   Magnetic resonance imaging: The evolution of breast imaging [J].
Heywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia H. ;
Hacker, Astrid ;
Sedlacek, Stefan .
BREAST, 2013, 22 :S77-S82
[10]   Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions [J].
Hu, Qiao ;
Wang, Xiao Yan ;
Zhu, Shang Yong ;
Kang, Li Ke ;
Xiao, Yan Ju ;
Zheng, Hong Yu .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (01) :25-33