Middle Fossa Approach for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Decade of Experience

被引:15
作者
Kosty, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Stevens, ShawnM. [2 ]
Gozal, Yair M. [1 ]
DiNapoli, Vincent A. [1 ]
Patel, Smruti K. [1 ]
Golub, Justin S. [3 ]
Andaluz, Norberto O. [1 ]
Pensak, Myles [2 ]
Zuccarello, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Samy, Ravi N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
Middle fossa; Acoustic neuroma; Vestibular schwannoma; Intracanalicular; Hearing preservation; Aural rehabilitation; Low-tone pure-tone average; BONE-ANCHORED HEARING; FACIAL-NERVE OUTCOMES; IPSILATERAL COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; ACOUSTIC NEUROMA RESECTION; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; NATURAL-HISTORY; TUMOR SURGERY; PRESERVATION; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1093/ons/opy126
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a challenging surgical technique for the resection of small and intermediate sized, primarily intracanalicular, vestibular schwannomas (VS), with the goal of hearing preservation (HP). OBJECTIVE: To describe a decade-long, single institutional experience with the MCF approach for resection of VS. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 63 patients who underwent the MCF approach for resection of VS from 2006 to 2016. Audiometric data included pure-tone average (PTA), low-tone pure-tone average (LtPTA), word recognition score, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) hearing classification at presentation and follow-up. Patients with postoperative serviceable (AAO-HNS class A-B) and/or useful (AAO-HNS class A-C) hearing were compared to those without HP. Facial nerve function was assessed using the House-Brackmann scale. RESULTS: The mean age and duration of follow-up were 50 +/- 13 yr and 21 +/- 21 mo, respectively. The mean tumor size was 10 +/- 4 mm. The serviceable and usable HP rates were 54% and 50%, respectively. Some residual hearing was preserved in 71% of patients. Large tumor size (P =.05), volume (P =.03), and extrameatal tumor extension (P =.03) were associated with poor audiometric outcomes. The presence of a fundal fluid cap (P =.01) was a favorable finding. At definitive testing, LtPTA was significantly better preserved than traditional PTA(P=. 01). Facial nerve outcomes, tumor control rates, and durability of audiometric outcomes were excellent. 47% of patients pursued aural rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: In our series, the MCF approach for VS provided excellent rates of tumor and facial nerve function, with durable serviceable HP.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Conservative management of acoustic neuroma [J].
Al Sanosi, A ;
Fagan, PA ;
Biggs, NDW .
SKULL BASE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2006, 16 (02) :95-99
[2]   SIMULTANEOUS COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION AND ACOUSTIC NEUROMA RESECTION - IMAGING CONSIDERATIONS, TECHNIQUE, AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME [J].
ARRIAGA, MMA ;
MARKS, CS .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1995, 112 (02) :325-328
[3]   Hearing preservation and facial nerve outcomes in vestibular schwannoma surgery: Results using the middle cranial fossa approach [J].
Arts, HA ;
Telian, SA ;
El-Kashlan, H ;
Thompson, BG .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (02) :234-241
[4]   Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment Clinical article [J].
El Bakkouri, Wissame ;
Kania, Romain E. ;
Guichard, Jean-Pierre ;
Lot, Guillaume ;
Herman, Philippe ;
Huy, Patrice Tran Ba .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 110 (04) :662-669
[5]   Is cochlear implantation possible after acoustic tumor removal? [J].
Belal, A .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2001, 22 (04) :497-500
[6]   Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: audiological results [J].
Boucek, Jan ;
Vokral, Jan ;
Cerny, Libor ;
Chovanec, Martin ;
Zabrodsky, Michal ;
Zverina, Eduard ;
Betka, Jan ;
Skrivan, Jiri .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (01) :133-141
[7]   Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery [J].
Brackmann, DE ;
Owens, RM ;
Friedman, RA ;
Hitselberger, WE ;
De la Cruz, A ;
House, JW ;
Nelson, RA ;
Luxford, WM ;
Slattery, WH ;
Fayad, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2000, 21 (03) :417-424
[8]   Middle fossa versus retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A prospective study [J].
Colletti, V ;
Fiorino, F .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) :927-934
[9]   Hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma: experience with the middle fossa approach [J].
DeMonte, Franco ;
Gidley, Paul W. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (03)
[10]   HEARING PRESERVATION IN ACOUSTIC TUMOR SURGERY - RESULTS AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
DORNHOFFER, JL ;
HELMS, J ;
HOEHMANN, DH .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1995, 105 (02) :184-187