Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation

被引:46
作者
Kocinaj, D.
Cioppa, A.
Arnbrosini, G.
Tesorio, T.
Salernme, L.
Sorropago, G.
Rubino, P.
Picano, E.
机构
[1] CNR, Inst Clin Physiol, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] Casa Cura Convenzionata Montevergine, Mercogliano, Italy
关键词
radiation; catheterization; malignancy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.09.035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ionising radiation carries an oncogenic risk which is linearly related to the dose. An estimation of the effective dose can be obtained from the measurements of the dose-area product (DAP), which is a measure of stochastic risk and a potential quality indicator. Aim: To assess radiation exposure of patients in a large volume cardiac cath-lab. Methods: A retrospective analysis of adult cardiac and peripheral percutaneous procedures (April to December 2004) was carried out to determine the DAP and estimated risk of malignancy. We identified 6 groups: Group 1 (n=100, coronary angiography and ventriculography); Group 2 (n=50, carotid stenting); Group 3 (n=50, aortography+coronary angiography+ventriculography); Group 4 (n=100, inferior extremities angiography+predilatation and stenting); Group 5 (n=100, coronary angiography+ventriculography+direct coronary stenting); Group 6 (n=100, coronary angiography+ventriculography+coronary predilation and stenting). Dose-area product meter attached on the X-ray unit was used for the estimation of the radiation dose received by the patient during the procedures. Results: DAP values (mean +/- S.D.) ranged from 41 +/- 30 Gycm(2) in Group 1 (lowest) to 118 +/- 89 Gycm(2) in Group 6 (highest). Within each group, individual radiation exposure varies substantially: from 11 to 200 Gycm(2) in Group 1, and from 30 to 733 Gycm2 in Group 6 patients. Average exposure in a Group 6 patient corresponds to a risk of mortality from a malignancy of about 1 in 1000. Conclusion: The radiation dose varies substantially across different types of procedures and up to tenfold within the same procedure. The enhanced knowledge of radiation dose might help the cardiologist to implement radiation sparing procedures eventually minimizing patient and operator radiation hazards in invasive cardiology. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 284
页数:2
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The biological effects of diagnostic cardiac imaging on chronically exposed physicians: The importance of being non-ionizing [J].
Andreassi M.G. .
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 2 (1)
[2]   Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures [J].
Betsou, S ;
Efstathopoulos, EP ;
Katritsis, D ;
Faulkner, K ;
Panayiotakis, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (846) :634-639
[3]   Lack of radiological awareness among physicians working in a tertiary-care cardiological centre [J].
Correia, MJ ;
Hellies, A ;
Andreassi, MG ;
Ghelarducci, B ;
Picano, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (03) :307-311
[4]  
*EUR COMM, 2001, RAD PROT, V118
[5]   Do physicians correctly estimate radiation risks from medical imaging? [J].
Finestone, A ;
Schlesinger, T ;
Amir, H ;
Richter, E ;
Milgrom, C .
ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2003, 58 (01) :59-61
[6]  
HART D, 2000, NRPBW14
[7]   ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures - A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training [J].
Hirshfeld, JW ;
Balter, SD ;
Brinker, JA ;
Kern, MJ ;
Klein, LW ;
Lindsay, BD ;
Tommaso, CL ;
Tracy, CM ;
Wagner, LK .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (04) :511-532
[8]  
*INT COMM RAD PROT, 2001, RAD YOUR PAT GUID ME
[9]  
Jacob K, 2004, CLIN RADIOL, V59, P928, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2004.04.020
[10]   Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks [J].
Lee, CI ;
Haims, AH ;
Monico, EP ;
Brink, JA ;
Forman, HP .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :393-398