A participative approach to develop sustainability indicators for dehesa agroforestry farms

被引:32
作者
Escribano, M. [1 ]
Diaz-Caro, C. [3 ]
Mesias, F. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Fac Vet Med, Dept Anim Prod & Food Sci, Ave Univ,S-N,Campus Univ, Caceres 10003, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Fac Agr, Dept Econ, Ave Adolfo Suarez,S-N, Badajoz 06007, Spain
[3] Univ Extremadura, Dept Accountabil, Campus Caceres, Caceres 30100, Spain
关键词
Dehesa; Sustainability; Indicators; Delphi method; Agro-forestry; DELPHI METHOD; SHEEP FARMS; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; FUTURE; SERVICES; SAFETY; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.297
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper provides a list of specific indicators that will allow the managers of dehesa farms to assess their sustainability in an easy and reliableway. To this end a Delphi analysis has been carried outwith a group of experts in agroforestry systems and sustainability. A total of 30 experts from public institutions, farming, research bodies, environmental and rural development associations, agricultural organizations and companies took part in the study which intended to design a set of sustainability indicators adapted to dehesa agroforestry systems. The experts scored 83 original indicators related to the basic pillars of sustainability (environmental, social and economic) through a two-round procedure. Finally, 24 indicators were selected based on their importance and the consensus achieved. From an environmental point of view, and in line with its significance for dehesa ecosystems, it has been observed that "Stocking rate" is the indicator with greater relevance. Within the economic pillar, "Farm profitability" is themost important indicator, while regarding the technical indicators "Percentage of animal diet based on grazing" is the one that got the highest score. Finally, the "Degree of job satisfaction" and the "Generational renewal" were the most relevant labor indicators. It is considered that the Delphi approach used in this research settles some of the flaws of other sustainability models, such as the adaptation to the system to be studied and the involvement of stakeholders in the design. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 97
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An approach to develop sustainability in a subject of Human Nutrition and Dietetics Degree, a pilot experience
    Angeles Bustamante, Maria
    Miranda, Jonatan
    Simon, Edurne
    Larretxi, Idoia
    Txurruka, Itziar
    Lasa, Arrate
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES,HEAD'16, 2016, 228 : 243 - 248
  • [32] The DEMATEL approach for integrating resilience indicators into building sustainability assessment frameworks
    Roostaie, S.
    Nawari, N.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 207
  • [33] Evaluation of sustainability indicators of machine tools: a hybrid Fuzzy DEMATEL approach
    Kumar, Girish
    James, Ajith Tom
    Kumar, Gourav
    Rajput, Romesh
    Choudhary, Sunny
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (07) : 18593 - 18624
  • [34] Food Security Indicators for Subsistence Farmers Sustainability: A System Dynamics Approach
    Guma, Isdore Paterson
    Rwashana, Agnes Semwanga
    Oyo, Benedict
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 7 (01) : 45 - 64
  • [35] Evaluating Organizational Sustainability: A Multi-Criteria Based-Approach to Sustainable Project Management Indicators
    Stanitsas, Marios
    Kirytopoulos, Konstantinos
    Aretoulis, Georgios
    SYSTEMS, 2021, 9 (03):
  • [36] Development and application of indicators for visual landscape quality to include in life cycle sustainability assessment of Swiss agricultural farms
    Schupbach, Beatrice
    Roesch, Andreas
    Herzog, Felix
    Szerencsits, Erich
    Walter, Thomas
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 110
  • [37] Efficiency assessment of medical diagnostic laboratories using undesirable sustainability indicators: A network data envelopment analysis approach
    Someh, N. Ghafari
    Pishvaee, M. S.
    Sadjadi, S. J.
    Soltani, R.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2022, 29 (03) : 1646 - 1661
  • [38] Expert-initiated integrated approach to the development of sustainability indicators for neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools: An African perspective
    Dawodu, Ayotunde
    Cheshmehzangi, Ali
    Williams, Arthur
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 240
  • [39] Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Pig Farms in Selected European Countries: Combining LCA and Key Performance Indicators for Biodiversity Assessment
    Ruckli, Antonia Katharina
    Dippel, Sabine
    Durec, Nora
    Gebska, Monika
    Guy, Jonathan
    Helmerichs, Juliane
    Leeb, Christine
    Vermeer, Herman
    Hoertenhuber, Stefan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [40] Iceberg Indicators for Animal Welfare in Rural Sheep Farms Using the Five Domains Model Approach
    Obrian Hernandez, Rick
    Alberto Sanchez, Jorge
    Romero, Marlyn H.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (12): : 1 - 16