Improving web survey efficiency: the impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response

被引:184
作者
Van Mol, Christof [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demog Inst KNAW UG, Migrat & Migrants, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Migrat & Intercultural Studies, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Web surveys; higher education; response rate; survey fatigue; students; NONRESPONSE BIAS; STUDENT ENGAGEMENT; ONLINE SURVEY; RATES; PARTICIPATION; DELIVERY; QUALITY; ORDER;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2016.1185255
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
With the growing possibilities for conducting web surveys, researchers increasingly use such surveys to recruit student samples for research purposes in a wide array of social science disciplines. Simultaneously, higher education students are recurrently asked to complete course and teacher evaluations online and to participate in small-scale research projects of fellow students, potentially leading to survey fatigue among student populations across the globe. One of the most frequently reported effects of over-surveying is a decrease in overall response rates. This situation has significant impacts on the generalizability and external validity of findings based on web surveys. The collection of reliable data is, nevertheless, crucial for researchers as well as educational practitioners and administrators, and strategies should be developed for achieving acceptable response rates. This paper reports on a methodological experiment (N=15,651) conducted at the University of Antwerp, Belgium, in which possible strategies to improve survey response are explored. I specifically focus on the impact of an extra reminder as well as specific reminder contents on response rates. The results reveal that extra reminders are effective for increasing response rates, but not for diversifying the sample.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 327
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience, Fatigue, and Academic Environments [J].
Adams, Meredith J. D. ;
Umbach, Paul D. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 53 (05) :576-591
[2]   Higher education demand in Spain: The influence of labour market signals and family background [J].
Albert, C .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2000, 40 (02) :147-162
[3]  
[Anonymous], 6 INT C SOC SCI METH
[4]   Electronic course evaluations: Does an Online delivery system influence student evaluations? [J].
Avery, RJ ;
Bryant, WK ;
Mathios, A ;
Kang, HJ ;
Bell, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2006, 37 (01) :21-37
[5]  
Callegaro M., 2015, Web Survey Methodology, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781529799651
[6]   Designing Scalar Questions for Web Surveys [J].
Christian, Leah Melani ;
Parsons, Nicholas L. ;
Dillman, Don A. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (03) :393-425
[7]   Social influence: Compliance and conformity [J].
Cialdini, RB ;
Goldstein, NJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 :591-621
[8]   The impact of progress indicators on task completion [J].
Conrad, Frederick G. ;
Couper, Mick P. ;
Tourangeau, Roger ;
Peytchev, Andy .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2010, 22 (05) :417-427
[9]   Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey [J].
Couper, Mick P. ;
Kapteyn, Arie ;
Schonlau, Matthias ;
Winter, Joachim .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2007, 36 (01) :131-148
[10]   WEB SURVEY METHODS INTRODUCTION [J].
Couper, Mick P. ;
Miller, Peter V. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (05) :831-835