Is there enough trust for the smart city? exploring acceptance for use of mobile phone data in oslo and tallinn

被引:33
作者
Julsrud, Tom Erik [1 ]
Krogstad, Julie Runde [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Int Climate Res CICERO, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[2] Inst Transport Econ TOI, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Trust; Mobile phone data; Smart cities; Big data; Trust cultures; BIG DATA; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; TRAVEL-TIME; PRIVACY; TECHNOLOGY; INSIGHTS; CITIZENS; SERVICES; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120314
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There are high hopes that a development towards smarter urban environments, backed up by various big data sources, can help solve many of the challenges facing today's large cities related to providing security, mitigating environmental damages, improving services and upscaling innovative and entrepreneurial activities. This study explores the acceptance of use of mobile phone data (MPD) in different areas, and how it is related to different types of trust. Based on a representative survey of citizens in the two smart cities, Oslo and Tallinn, four similar trust cultures are located. The acceptance of use of MPD differed significantly between the trust cultures and, as expected, was significantly stronger in groups with higher levels of trust, either generally or in terms of reliance on technologies. The acceptance of use of MPD for commercial product development was low for all groups. Findings suggest that future users of MPD need to be aware of the significant scepticism toward and rejection of the use of such data in large parts of the population. Unless visions of the smart city are grounded in the needs and wants of citizens, such plans are not likely to succeed, and negative understandings and images of a panoptic state may take stronger hold. As for now, however, there seems to be insufficient social trust to exploit this on a wider scale without creating even more scepticism and distrust.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 103 条
[41]   Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model [J].
Gefen, D ;
Karahanna, E ;
Straub, DW .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2003, 27 (01) :51-90
[42]   Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior [J].
Gerber, Nina ;
Gerber, Paul ;
Volkamer, Melanie .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2018, 77 :226-261
[43]   Thinking about Smart Cities: The Travels of a Policy Idea that Promises a Great Deal, but So Far Has Delivered Modest Results [J].
Glasmeier, Amy K. ;
Nebiolo, Molly .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (11)
[44]  
Goffman E., 1974, FRAME ANAL ESSAY ORG
[45]  
Gregersen F.A., 2018, NETWORK DATA MOBILE
[46]   Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? [J].
Grossi, Giuseppe ;
Pianezzi, Daniela .
CITIES, 2017, 69 :79-85
[47]   The trust gap: Social perceptions of privacy data for energy services in the United Kingdom [J].
Grunewald, Phil ;
Reisch, Theresa .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 68
[48]  
Hardin R., 2006, TRUST KEY CONCEPTS
[49]  
Heckscher C., 2015, Trust in a Complex World: Enriching Community
[50]  
Hollands R., 2009, CITY, V12, P303, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604810802479126