A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease

被引:30
作者
Brown, Leanne [1 ,2 ]
Gardner, Glenn [1 ,2 ]
Bonner, Ann [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Chron Kidney Dis Ctr Res Excellence, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Metro North Hosp & Hlth Serv, Kidney Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
chronic kidney disease; decision support intervention; dialysis; nursing; ottawa decision support framework; shared decision-making; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL OUTCOMES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SYMPTOM BURDEN; DIALYSIS; CARE; AID; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14112
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of a decision support intervention (OPTIONS) in facilitating the older person with advanced kidney disease to make a treatment choice. Design Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Methods People aged >= 70 years with advanced kidney disease (eGFR <= 20 ml/min/1.73m(2)) who had not made a decision about treatment options and who were not eligible for a kidney transplant were recruited between March 2015 and March 2016. Participants were randomly allocated to receive the OPTIONS (N = 16) or standard care (N = 21). OPTIONS is a 4-week nurse-delivered intervention. Primary outcomes were decision conflict and decision regret, the secondary outcomes were knowledge of risk and benefits of dialysis and health-related quality of life. The usefulness of OPTIONS was also evaluated. Results There were no differences between the intervention and standard care groups at baseline. At T1, there were no significant differences in decision conflict and decision regret although the intervention group had lower decisional conflict at T2. The decision support intervention was able to significantly improve the participants' knowledge score in the intervention group. There were no observable differences between groups for health-related quality of life physical and mental health component summary scores. OPTIONS was helpful in preparing participants in making a treatment decision. Conclusion OPTIONS, a decision support intervention, increased a person's knowledge of the benefits and risks of dialysis and can be used to facilitate shared decision-making with older adults with advanced stages of kidney disease. Impact Strategies to improve shared decision-making between older people with advanced stages of kidney disease and their clinicians are crucial for patient autonomy in a population where this may not be common practice. The decision support intervention- OPTIONS demonstrated significant improvement in patient knowledge about different treatment pathways. OPTIONS provides a structured and evidence-based approach to support shared decision-making for this population. Trial Registration ACTRN 12614001090606 Registered 14/10/2014.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3044
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]  
MCDONALD S, 2012, ANZDATA REGISTRY 201, pCH3
[42]   A decision aid for long-term tube feeding in cognitively impaired older persons [J].
Mitchell, SL ;
Tetroe, J ;
O'Connor, AM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2001, 49 (03) :313-316
[43]  
Schulz Kenneth F, 2010, Open Med, V4, pe60, DOI [10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001, 10.1136/bmj.c869]
[44]  
MOONEY C, 2011, QUANTITATIVE APPL SO
[45]   Whose Choice Is It? Shared Decision Making in Nephrology Care [J].
Murray, Mary Ann ;
Bissonnette, Janice ;
Kryworuchko, Jennifer ;
Gifford, Wendy ;
Calverley, Sharon .
SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2013, 26 (02) :169-174
[46]   Trajectories of Illness in Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Longitudinal Study of Patient Symptoms and Concerns in the Last Year of Life [J].
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. ;
Sheerin, Neil S. ;
Addington-Hall, Julia ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 6 (07) :1580-1590
[47]   Dialysis or conservative care for frail older patients: ethics of shared decision-making [J].
Muthalagappan, Seetha ;
Johansson, Lina ;
Kong, Wing May ;
Brown, Edwina A. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 (11) :2717-2722
[48]  
O'Connor A.M., 2011, Ottawa Decision Support Tutorial (ODST). Improving practitioners' decision support skills
[49]  
O'Connor A.M., 2006, OTTAWA DECISION SUPP
[50]   Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options [J].
O'Connor, AM ;
Mulley, AG ;
Wennberg, JE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (08) :570-571