A randomized controlled trial testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease

被引:27
|
作者
Brown, Leanne [1 ,2 ]
Gardner, Glenn [1 ,2 ]
Bonner, Ann [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Nursing, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Victoria Pk Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Chron Kidney Dis Ctr Res Excellence, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Metro North Hosp & Hlth Serv, Kidney Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
chronic kidney disease; decision support intervention; dialysis; nursing; ottawa decision support framework; shared decision-making; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL OUTCOMES; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; SYMPTOM BURDEN; DIALYSIS; CARE; AID; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/jan.14112
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of a decision support intervention (OPTIONS) in facilitating the older person with advanced kidney disease to make a treatment choice. Design Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Methods People aged >= 70 years with advanced kidney disease (eGFR <= 20 ml/min/1.73m(2)) who had not made a decision about treatment options and who were not eligible for a kidney transplant were recruited between March 2015 and March 2016. Participants were randomly allocated to receive the OPTIONS (N = 16) or standard care (N = 21). OPTIONS is a 4-week nurse-delivered intervention. Primary outcomes were decision conflict and decision regret, the secondary outcomes were knowledge of risk and benefits of dialysis and health-related quality of life. The usefulness of OPTIONS was also evaluated. Results There were no differences between the intervention and standard care groups at baseline. At T1, there were no significant differences in decision conflict and decision regret although the intervention group had lower decisional conflict at T2. The decision support intervention was able to significantly improve the participants' knowledge score in the intervention group. There were no observable differences between groups for health-related quality of life physical and mental health component summary scores. OPTIONS was helpful in preparing participants in making a treatment decision. Conclusion OPTIONS, a decision support intervention, increased a person's knowledge of the benefits and risks of dialysis and can be used to facilitate shared decision-making with older adults with advanced stages of kidney disease. Impact Strategies to improve shared decision-making between older people with advanced stages of kidney disease and their clinicians are crucial for patient autonomy in a population where this may not be common practice. The decision support intervention- OPTIONS demonstrated significant improvement in patient knowledge about different treatment pathways. OPTIONS provides a structured and evidence-based approach to support shared decision-making for this population. Trial Registration ACTRN 12614001090606 Registered 14/10/2014.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3044
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized controlled trial protocol testing a decision support intervention for older patients with advanced kidney disease
    Brown, Leanne
    Gardner, Glenn
    Bonner, Ann
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (05) : 1191 - 1202
  • [2] Use of a Supportive Kidney Care Video Decision Aid in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Eneanya, Nwamaka D.
    Percy, Shananssa G.
    Stallings, Taylor L.
    Wang, Wei
    Steele, David J. R.
    Germain, Michael J.
    Schell, Jane O.
    Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.
    Volandes, Angelo E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 51 (09) : 736 - 744
  • [3] A Patient Decision Aid About Conservative Kidney Management in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Randomized Pilot Trial
    Wong, Susan P. Y.
    Oestreich, Taryn
    Prince, David K.
    Curtis, J. Randall
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2023, 82 (02) : 179 - 188
  • [4] Decision Making in Elderly Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease
    Koncicki, Holly M.
    Swidler, Mark A.
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2013, 29 (03) : 641 - +
  • [5] Older Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Their Perspectives on Prognostic Information: a Qualitative Study
    Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg
    Suarez, Nataly R. Espinoza
    Curtis, Susan
    Beck, Annika T.
    Hargraves, Ian
    Shaw, Kevin
    Wong, Susan P. Y.
    Hickson, LaTonya J.
    Boehmer, Kasey R.
    Amberg, Brigid
    Dahlen, Erin
    Wirtz, Cristina
    Albright, Robert C.
    Kumbamu, Ashok
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    Sutton, Erica J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (05) : 1031 - 1037
  • [6] Effectiveness of a brief hope intervention for chronic kidney disease patients on the decisional conflict and quality of life: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Chan, Kitty
    Wong, Frances Kam Yuet
    Tam, Suet Lai
    Kwok, Ching Ping
    Fung, Yuen Ping
    Wong, Ping Nam
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] A psychosocial intervention for individuals with advanced chronic kidney disease: A feasibility randomized controlled trial
    Jenkins, Zoe M.
    Tan, Eric J.
    O'Flaherty, Emmet
    Knowles, Simon
    Thompson, David R.
    Ski, Chantal F.
    Rossell, Susan L.
    Coco, Carolee
    Ierino, Francesco L.
    Gock, Hilton
    Castle, David J.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 26 (05) : 442 - 453
  • [8] Communication Skills and Decision Making for Elderly Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease: A Guide for Nephrologists
    Koncicki, Holly M.
    Schell, Jane O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2016, 67 (04) : 688 - 695
  • [9] Putting patients at the center of kidney care transitions: PREPARE NOW, a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Green, J. A.
    Ephraim, P. L.
    Hill-Briggs, F. F.
    Browne, T.
    Strigo, T. S.
    Hauer, C. L.
    Stametz, R. A.
    Darer, J. D.
    Patel, U. D.
    Lang-Lindsey, K.
    Bankes, B. L.
    Bolden, S. A.
    Danielson, P.
    Ruff, S.
    Schmidt, L.
    Swoboda, A.
    Woods, P.
    Vinson, B.
    Littlewood, D.
    Jackson, G.
    Pendergast, J. F.
    Russell, St. Clair J.
    Collins, K.
    Norfolk, E.
    Bucaloiu, I. D.
    Kethireddy, S.
    Collins, C.
    Davis, D.
    Deprisco, J.
    Malloy, D.
    Diamantidis, C. J.
    Fulmer, S.
    Martin, J.
    Schatell, D.
    Tangri, N.
    Sees, A.
    Siegrist, C.
    Breed, J., Jr.
    Medley, A.
    Graboski, E.
    Billet, J.
    Hackenberg, M.
    Singer, D.
    Stewart, S.
    Alkon, A.
    Bhaysar, N. A.
    Lewis-Boyer, L.
    Martz, C.
    Yule, C.
    Greer, R. C.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 73 : 98 - 110
  • [10] Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of an erythropoietin stimulating agent decision aid for anemia treatment in kidney disease
    Beach, Lauren B.
    Wild, Marcus
    Ramachandran, Gowri
    Ikizler, H. Omer
    Cavanaugh, Kerri L.
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 17