Mass Balance of Fipronil and Total Toxicity of Fipronil-Related Compounds in Process Streams during Conventional Wastewater and Wetland Treatment

被引:52
作者
Supowit, Samuel D. [1 ]
Sadaria, Akash M. [1 ]
Reyes, Edward J. [1 ]
Halden, Rolf U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Biodesign Inst, Ctr Environm Secur & Global Secur Initiat, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
SURFACE WATERS; APIS-MELLIFERA; HONEY-BEES; NEONICOTINOIDS; FIELD; FATE; DEGRADATION; PERSISTENCE; CALIFORNIA; SEDIMENTS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.5b04516
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Attenuation of the pesticide fipronil and its major degradates was determined during conventional wastewater treatment and wetland treatment. Analysis of flow-weighted composite samples by liquid and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry showed fipronil occurrence at 12-31 ng/L in raw sewage, primary effluent, secondary effluent, chlorinated effluent, and wetland effluent. Mean daily loads of total fipronil related compounds in raw sewage and in plant effluent after chlorination were statistically indistinguishable (p = 0.29; n = 10), whereas fipronil itself was partially removed (25 +/- 3%; p = 0.00025; n = 10); the associated loss in toxicity was balanced by the formation of toxic fipronil degradates, showing conventional treatment to be unfit for reducing overall toxicity. In contrast to these findings at the municipal wastewater treatment, both parental fipronil and the sum of fipronil-related compounds were removed in the wetland with efficiencies of 44 +/- 4% and 47 +/- 13%, respectively. Total fipronil concentrations in plant effluent (28 +/- 6 ng/L as fipronil) were within an order of magnitude of half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) of nontarget invertebrates. This is the first systematic assessment of the fate of fipronil and its major degradates during full-scale conventional wastewater and constructed wetland treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1526
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Uptake and xylem transport of fipronil in sunflower [J].
Aajoud, Asmae ;
Raveton, Muriel ;
Aouadi, Heddia ;
Tissut, Michel ;
Ravanel, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (14) :5055-5060
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, EST PROGR INT SUIT M
[3]   Environmental impact of Fipronil to the Louisiana crawfish industry [J].
Bedient, PB ;
Horsak, RD ;
Schlenk, D ;
Hovinga, RM ;
Pierson, JD .
ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2005, 6 (03) :289-299
[4]   Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil [J].
Bonmatin, J. -M. ;
Giorio, C. ;
Girolami, V. ;
Goulson, D. ;
Kreutzweiser, D. P. ;
Krupke, C. ;
Liess, M. ;
Long, E. ;
Marzaro, M. ;
Mitchell, E. A. D. ;
Noome, D. A. ;
Simon-Delso, N. ;
Tapparo, A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (01) :35-67
[5]  
Bonmatin J. M., 2007, INT C BEES AGR BIOD
[6]   Degradation of fipronil in anaerobic sediments and the effect on porewater concentrations [J].
Brennan, Amanda A. ;
Harwood, Amanda D. ;
You, Jing ;
Landrum, Peter F. ;
Lydy, Michael J. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2009, 77 (01) :22-28
[7]   Monitoring Fipronil and Degradates in California Surface Waters, 2008-2013 [J].
Budd, Robert ;
Ensminger, Michael ;
Wang, Dan ;
Goh, Kean S. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (04) :1233-1240
[8]  
Chamberlain EF, 2010, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V58, P6895, DOI [10.1021/jf1008721, 10.1021/jf100872f]
[9]   Population consequences of fipronil and degradates to copepods at field concentrations: An integration of life cycle testing with Leslie matrix population Modeling [J].
Chandler, GT ;
Cary, TL ;
Bejarano, AC ;
Pender, J ;
Ferry, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (23) :6407-6414
[10]  
Chauzat MP, 2006, J ECON ENTOMOL, V99, P253, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-99.2.253