An Integrated Comparative Assessment of Coal-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Vis-a-Vis Renewable Energies in India's Low Carbon Electricity Transition Scenarios

被引:12
|
作者
Hiremath, Mitavachan [1 ,2 ]
Viebahn, Peter [1 ]
Samadi, Sascha [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuppertal Inst Climate Environm & Energy, Doppersberg 19, D-42103 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Ctr Sustainabil Policy & Technol Management SusPo, 387,14th B Cross, Yelahanka New Town 560064, Bengaluru, India
关键词
carbon capture and storage (CCS); renewable energy; levelized costs; India’ s energy transition; energy-water nexus; integrated assessment; solar energy; coal transition; meta-analysis; climate mitigation; FIRED POWER-PLANTS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; FOSSIL-FUEL; CO2; EMISSIONS; WATER-USE; GENERATION; POLICY; CHINA; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/en14020262
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Roadmaps for India's energy future foresee that coal power will continue to play a considerable role until the middle of the 21st century. Among other options, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being considered as a potential technology for decarbonising the power sector. Consequently, it is important to quantify the relative benefits and trade-offs of coal-CCS in comparison to its competing renewable power sources from multiple sustainability perspectives. In this paper, we assess coal-CCS pathways in India up to 2050 and compare coal-CCS with conventional coal, solar PV and wind power sources through an integrated assessment approach coupled with a nexus perspective (energy-cost-climate-water nexus). Our levelized costs assessment reveals that coal-CCS is expensive and significant cost reductions would be needed for CCS to compete in the Indian power market. In addition, although carbon pricing could make coal-CCS competitive in relation to conventional coal power plants, it cannot influence the lack of competitiveness of coal-CCS with respect to renewables. From a climate perspective, CCS can significantly reduce the life cycle GHG emissions of conventional coal power plants, but renewables are better positioned than coal-CCS if the goal is ambitious climate change mitigation. Our water footprint assessment reveals that coal-CCS consumes an enormous volume of water resources in comparison to conventional coal and, in particular, to renewables. To conclude, our findings highlight that coal-CCS not only suffers from typical new technology development related challenges-such as a lack of technical potential assessments and necessary support infrastructure, and high costs-but also from severe resource constraints (especially water) in an era of global warming and the competition from outperforming renewable power sources. Our study, therefore, adds a considerable level of techno-economic and environmental nexus specificity to the current debate about coal-based large-scale CCS and the low carbon energy transition in emerging and developing economies in the Global South.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Recent advances in microalgal carbon capture and utilization (bio-CCU) process vis-a-vis conventional carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies
    Sen, Ramkrishna
    Mukherjee, Sayari
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 54 (24) : 1777 - 1802
  • [2] Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies
    Viebahn, Peter
    Daniel, Vallentin
    Samuel, Hoeller
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 97 : 238 - 248
  • [3] Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India's power sector - An integrated assessment
    Viebahn, Peter
    Vallentin, Daniel
    Hoeller, Samuel
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 117 : 62 - 75
  • [4] Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China's power sector - An integrated assessment
    Viebahn, Peter
    Vallentin, Daniel
    Hoeller, Samuel
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 157 : 229 - 244
  • [5] Integrated Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in South Africa's Power Sector
    Viebahn, Peter
    Vallentin, Daniel
    Hoeller, Samuel
    ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (12): : 14380 - 14406
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review
    Wang, Yan
    Pan, Zhen
    Zhang, Wenxiang
    Borhani, Tohid N.
    Li, Rui
    Zhang, Zhien
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 207
  • [7] Employment impact assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China's power sector based on input-output model
    Jiang, Yong
    Lei, Yalin
    Yan, Xin
    Yang, Yongzhi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (15) : 15665 - 15676
  • [8] Study on carbon capture and storage (CCS) investment decision-making based on real options for China's coal-fired power plants
    Wang, Xiping
    Du, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 4123 - 4131