Identifying the Major Construction Wastes in the Building Construction Phase Based on Life Cycle Assessments

被引:18
|
作者
Park, Won-Jun [1 ]
Kim, Rakhyun [2 ]
Roh, Seungjun [3 ]
Ban, Hoki [4 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Samcheok 25913, South Korea
[2] GREENers, Ansan 15455, South Korea
[3] Kumoh Natl Inst Technol, Sch Architecture, Gumi 39177, South Korea
[4] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Samcheok 25913, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
major construction wastes; life cycle assessment; construction phase; OZONE CREATION POTENTIALS; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; ASSESSMENT LCA; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3390/su12198096
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to identify the major wastes generated during the construction phase using a life cycle assessment. To accomplish this, the amount of waste generated in the construction phase was deduced using the loss rate and weight conversions. Major construction wastes were assessed using six comprehensive environmental impact categories, including global warming potential, abiotic depletion potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. According to the analysis results, five main construction wastes-concrete, rebar, cement, polystyrene panel, and concrete block-comprehensively satisfied the 95% cutoff criteria for all six environmental impact categories. The results of the environmental impact characterization assessment revealed that concrete, concrete block, and cement waste accounted for over 70% of the contribution level in all the environmental impact categories except resource depletion. Insulation materials accounted for 1% of the total waste generated but were identified by the environmental impact assessment to have the highest contribution level.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating the Energy Performance Gap into Life Cycle Assessments of Building Renovations
    Decorte, Yanaika
    Steeman, Marijke
    Van Den Bossche, Nathan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of mass timber construction: A review
    Duan, Zhuocheng
    Huang, Qiong
    Zhang, Qi
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 221
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management
    Butera, Stefania
    Christensen, Thomas H.
    Astrup, Thomas F.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 44 : 196 - 205
  • [34] Environmental innovations in the construction sector and life cycle approach
    Campioli, Andrea
    Lavagna, Monica
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 5 : 66 - 73
  • [35] Construction of life cycle assessment software system platform
    张亚平
    Journal of Chongqing University(English Edition), 2007, (01) : 35 - 40
  • [36] Construction cost control based on PDCA cycle
    Jianbing L.
    Jianliang C.
    International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, 2016, 17 (37): : 19.1 - 19.8
  • [37] Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using Building Information Modeling (BIM)
    Jalaei, Farzad
    Zoghi, Milad
    Khoshand, Afshin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 21 (08) : 784 - 801
  • [38] Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment of an Innovative Bio-Based Material in Construction: A Case Study of a Phase Change Material Panel
    Heidari, Mohammad Davoud
    Mathis, Damien
    Blanchet, Pierre
    Amor, Ben
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (02)
  • [39] FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATING INDOOR AIR QUALITY IMPACTS INTO LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENTS OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING RELATED PRODUCTS
    Wu, Susie R.
    Apul, Defne
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2015, 10 (01): : 127 - +
  • [40] The influence of the Functional Unit on the comparability of life cycle assessments in the construction sector: A Systematic Literature Review and attempt at unification for Reinforced Concrete
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Hinkle-Johnson, Rowan
    Traverso, Marzia
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2023, 18