The Advantages of Retrieval-Based and Spaced Practice: Implications for Word Learning in Clinical and Educational Contexts

被引:21
作者
Gordon, Katherine R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, Ctr Childhood Deafness Language & Learning, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
关键词
DEVELOPMENTAL LANGUAGE DISORDER; VOCABULARY INTERVENTION; KINDERGARTEN-CHILDREN; DISTRIBUTED PRACTICE; IMPAIRMENT; RETENTION; INTENSITY; FREQUENCY; STUDENTS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19i-00001
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Researchers in the cognitive sciences have identified several key training strategies that support good encoding and retention of target information. These strategies are retrieval-based practice, also known as learning through testing, and spaced practice. The recent resurgence of research on retrieval-based and spaced practice has been extended to investigate the effectiveness of these strategies to support learning in individuals with language disorders. The purpose of the current article is to review key principles of retrieval-based and spaced practice that can be used to support word learning in individuals within clinical and educational contexts. Conclusion: Current research provides evidence that principles of retrieval-based and spaced practice can enhance word learning for individuals with language disorders. Current research provides guidance for clinicians on how to implement these strategies both within and across sessions to support encoding and retention of target information. Additional research should be conducted to provide a better understanding of how to optimize encoding and retention in clinical and educational contexts. Most notably, research that examines long-term retention after interventions are withdrawn would further our understanding of how these principles can be optimally applied to improve outcomes for individuals with language disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 965
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing [J].
Adesope, Olusola O. ;
Trevisan, Dominic A. ;
Sundararajan, Narayankripa .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 87 (03) :659-701
[2]  
Beck I. L., 2013, BRINGING WORDS LIFE
[3]  
Bjork Elizabeth L., 2011, Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, P55, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[4]  
Bjork RA, 2015, AM J PSYCHOL, V128, P241
[5]  
BLANTON WilliamE., 1990, Reading, research and instruction, V29, P35, DOI DOI 10.1080/19388079009558015
[6]   Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (04) :918-928
[7]   Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (03) :604-616
[8]   Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (4-5) :514-527
[9]   Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying [J].
Butler, Andrew C. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) :1118-1133
[10]   Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected [J].
Butterfield, B ;
Metcalfe, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (06) :1491-1494