Reflexivity Beyond Regulations: Teaching Research Ethics and Qualitative Methods in Germany

被引:11
作者
von Unger, Hella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Sociol, D-80801 Munich, Germany
关键词
research ethics; sociology; informed consent; objectivity; subjectivity; confidentiality; Germany;
D O I
10.1177/1077800415620220
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Research ethics are an integral part of the research process and are not limited to institutionalized regulatory procedures. While there is no standard formula for ethical reflexivity and practice, the question arises as to how research ethics can be taught as part of a curriculum for qualitative research. The approach taken here is one of learning by doing. Sociology students were trained to pursue a research question and reflect on ethical aspects of their experiences. Their research projects explored the meaning of a trial against a neo-Nazi group in Munich, Germany. In teams, the students conducted qualitative interviews on how members of local communities viewed the trial. The students' questions and learning experiences regarding research ethics are analyzed. Key topics of discussion include informed consent, researcher subjectivity, and the de/merits of ethics codes and guidelines. Recommendations are drawn for teaching research ethics in qualitative methods training in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 98
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethics, regulation, and beyond: the landscape of research with pregnant women
    Carla Saenz
    Phaik Yeong Cheah
    Rieke van der Graaf
    Leslie Meltzer Henry
    Anna C. Mastroianni
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 14
  • [42] Ethics, regulation, and beyond: the landscape of research with pregnant women
    Saenz, Carla
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    van der Graaf, Rieke
    Henry, Leslie Meltzer
    Mastroianni, Anna C.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2017, 14
  • [43] Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data: informed consent at a cross-road
    Gefenas, Eugenijus
    Lekstutiene, J.
    Lukaseviciene, V
    Hartlev, M.
    Mourby, M.
    Cathaoir, K. O.
    [J]. MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 25 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [44] Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data: informed consent at a cross-road
    Eugenijus Gefenas
    J. Lekstutiene
    V. Lukaseviciene
    M. Hartlev
    M. Mourby
    K.Ó Cathaoir
    [J]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2022, 25 : 23 - 30
  • [45] 'Text-work' in Research Ethics Review: The significance of documents in and beyond committee meetings
    Morton, Julie
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 25 (7-8): : 387 - 403
  • [46] A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics
    Zimmer, Michael
    Proferes, Nicholas John
    [J]. ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 66 (03) : 250 - 261
  • [47] SOCIALISING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS INTO RESEARCH METHODS AND ETHICS
    Ngwane, Cabangile N.
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 7170 - 7174
  • [48] Respecting children`s rights in research ethics and research methods
    Stapf, Ingrid
    Biess, Cora
    Pfetsch, Jan
    Paschel, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDREN AND MEDIA, 2023, 17 (03) : 393 - 399
  • [49] Illuminating the Role of Reflexivity Within Qualitative Pilot Studies: Experiences From a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Project
    Lees, Amanda B.
    Walters, Simon
    Godbold, Rosemary
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21
  • [50] Laboratory Safety Regulations and Training must Emphasize the Underpinning Research Ethics Perspectives
    Tang, Bor Luen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2025, 23 (01) : 159 - 165