Measuring service outcomes for adaptive preventive maintenance

被引:16
作者
Ohman, Mikael [1 ]
Finne, Max [2 ]
Holmstrom, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Ind Engn & Management, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
Service performance; Statistical process control; Outcome measurement; Preventive maintenance; Design science; STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM-DESIGN; MANUFACTURING-INDUSTRIES; AGENCY THEORY; QUALITY; MODELS; RELIABILITY; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.020
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Services account for an increasing share of economic activity in the western world. As part of this, preventive maintenance (PM) service volumes are constantly growing as a result of a growing (and aging) asset population and maintenance outsourcing. While the pursuit of improved service productivity is in the interest of both firms and nations, the challenges of measuring service performance, and more specifically service outcomes, persist. This paper presents an outcome-based measure for fleet PM, which has far-reaching implications considering service productivity and performance measurement. We develop a statistical process control based measure that utilizes data typically available in PM. The measure is grounded in reliability theory, which enables generalization of the measure within PM services but also outlines the limitations of its application. Finally we apply the measure in a PM field service process of a servitized equipment manufacturer. Based on actual maintenance records we show that the service provider could reduce their service output by at least 5-10% without significantly affecting the aggregate service outcome. The developed measure and control process form the basis for adaptive preventive maintenance, which is expected to facilitate the transition towards outcome-based contracts through complementing condition-based maintenance. One of the key benefits of the approach is that it provides a cost-effective way of revealing the scarcely studied phenomenon of service overproduction. Based on our case, we conclude that there are significant productivity gains in making sure that you meet required standards for service output but do not exceed them. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 467
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [31] Meth MA, 1992, P A REL MAI, DOI [10.1109/ARMS.1992.187846, DOI 10.1109/ARMS.1992.187846]
  • [32] Murthy D.N. P., 2008, PRODUCT RELIABILITY
  • [33] Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach
    Neely, A
    Mills, J
    Platts, K
    Richards, H
    Gregory, M
    Bourne, M
    Kennerley, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (9-10) : 1119 - 1145
  • [34] Performance measurement system design - A literature review and research agenda
    Neely, A
    Gregory, M
    Platts, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1995, 15 (04) : 80 - 116
  • [35] Outcome-based contracts as a driver for systems thinking and service-dominant logic in service science: Evidence from the defence industry
    Ng, Irene C. L.
    Maull, Roger
    Yip, Nick
    [J]. EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 27 (06) : 377 - 387
  • [36] State of the art literature review on performance measurement
    Nudurupati, S. S.
    Bititci, U. S.
    Kumar, V.
    Chan, F. T. S.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 60 (02) : 279 - 290
  • [37] Oakland J.S., 2008, STAT PROCESS CONTROL, V6th
  • [38] Managing the transition from products to services
    Oliva, R
    Kallenberg, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 2003, 14 (02): : 160 - 172
  • [39] Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry
    Oliva, R
    Sterman, JD
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (07) : 894 - 914
  • [40] An economically designed, integrated quality and maintenance model using an adaptive Shewhart chart
    Panagiotidou, Sofia
    Nenes, George
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (03) : 732 - 741