Continuous Dynamic Constrained Optimization With Ensemble of Locating and Tracking Feasible Regions Strategies

被引:55
作者
Bu, Chenyang [1 ]
Luo, Wenjian [1 ]
Yue, Lihua [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Anhui Prov Key Lab Software Engn, Hefei 230027, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dynamic constraints; evolutionary dynamic constrained optimization; gradient-based repair; species; track feasible regions; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM IDEA; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZER; MEMORY; DESIGN; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2016.2567644
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Dynamic constrained optimization problems (DCOPs) are difficult to solve because both objective function and constraints can vary with time. Although DCOPs have drawn attention in recent years, little work has been performed to solve DCOPs with multiple dynamic feasible regions from the perspective of locating and tracking multiple feasible regions in parallel. Moreover, few benchmarks have been proposed to simulate the dynamics of multiple disconnected feasible regions. In this paper, first, the idea of tracking multiple feasible regions, originally proposed by Nguyen and Yao, is enhanced by specifically adopting multiple subpopulations. To this end, the dynamic species-based particle swam optimization (DSPSO), a representative multipopulation algorithm, is adopted. Second, an ensemble of locating and tracking feasible regions strategies is proposed to handle different types of dynamics in constraints. Third, two benchmarks are designed to simulate the DCOPs with dynamic constraints. The first benchmark, including two variants of G24 (called G24v and G24w), could control the size of feasible regions. The second benchmark, named moving feasible regions benchmark (MFRB), is highly configurable. The global optimum of MFRB is calculated mathematically for experimental comparisons. Experimental results on G24, G24v, G24w, and MFRB show that the DSPSO with the ensemble of strategies performs significantly better than the original DSPSO and other typical algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 33
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Ameca-Alducin MY, 2014, 2014 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), P975, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2014.6900629
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, PARALLEL PROBLEM SOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P 2010 C EV COMP BAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
[5]  
Aragon V.S., 2013, Metaheuristics for Dynamic Optimization, P225, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30665-5_
[6]  
Aragón VS, 2008, J COMPUT SCI TECHNOL, V8, P158
[7]   Multiswarms, exclusion, and anti-convergence in dynamic environments [J].
Blackwell, Tim ;
Branke, Juergen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (04) :459-472
[8]  
Bonyadi M., IEEE T EVOL COMPUT
[9]  
Bonyadi M.R., 2015, Evolutionary Constrained Optimization, P205, DOI [10.1007/978-81-322-2184-5_8, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2184-5_8]
[10]   Analysis of Stability, Local Convergence, and Transformation Sensitivity of a Variant of the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm [J].
Bonyadi, Mohammad Reza ;
Michalewicz, Zbigniew .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (03) :370-385