Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants

被引:8
|
作者
Turitz, Amy L. [1 ]
Quant, Hayley [1 ]
Schwartz, Nadav [1 ]
Elovitz, Michal [1 ]
Bastek, Jamie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perelman Sch Med, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abdominal circumference; estimated fetal weight; intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; ultrasound; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; ULTRASOUND; RETARDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1353438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether (1) isolated fetal abdominal circumference < 5% (AC5) in absence of growth restriction (estimated fetal weight < 10% [EFW10]) or (2) borderline fetal growth 10 to 19% (EFW10-19) predicts subsequent fetal and/or neonatal growth restriction. Study Design The authors performed a retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2011) of women with singleton pregnancies between 26 and 36 weeks who had >= 1 growth ultrasound. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 with both subsequent sonographic diagnosis of EFW10 and neonatal diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA). Test characteristics were calculated. Results Out of the 10,642 pregnancies, prevalence of isolated AC5, EFW10-19, EFW10, and SGA were as follows: AC5, 5.31%; EFW10-19, 13.30%; EFW10, 7.95%; and SGA, 17.63%. While screening for SGA using EFW10 alone would miss 68.34% of SGA neonates, using isolated AC5 would identify an additional 16.15% of SGA neonates with a 3.7% false positive rate. Using EFW10-19 would identify an additional 40.20% of SGA neonates with a 9.0% false positive rate. Conclusion Fetuses with isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 are at an increased risk of growth restriction. Using isolated AC5 or composite EFW10-19 would identify SGA neonates that are missed using conventional sonographic definitions of growth restriction alone.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Abdominal Circumference Alone versus Estimated Fetal Weight after 24 Weeks to Predict Small or Large for Gestational Age at Birth: A Meta-Analysis
    Blue, Nathan R.
    Yordan, Jose M. Perez
    Holbrook, Bradley D.
    Nirgudkar, Pranita A.
    Mozurkewich, Ellen L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 34 (11) : 1115 - 1124
  • [2] Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age
    Di Lorenzo, Giovanni
    Monasta, Lorenzo
    Ceccarello, Matteo
    Cecotti, Vera
    D'Ottavio, Giuseppina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [3] The effect of a sonographic estimated fetal weight on the risk of cesarean delivery in macrosomic and small for gestational-age infants
    Matthews, Kathy C.
    Williamson, John
    Gupta, Simi
    Lam-Rachlin, Jennifer
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Fox, Nathan S.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (10) : 1172 - 1176
  • [4] Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight in Small for Gestational Age and Appropriate for Gestational Age Grown Periviable Neonates
    Haragan, Adriane
    Himes, Katherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (08) : 703 - 706
  • [5] Abdominal circumference vs. estimated weight to predict large for gestational age birth weight in diabetic pregnancy
    Holcomb, WL
    Mostello, DJ
    Gray, DL
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2000, 24 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age
    Price, Corley Rachelle
    Roeckner, Jared
    Odibo, Linda
    Odibo, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (20) : 3931 - 3936
  • [7] Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth
    Doulaveris, Georgios
    Gallagher, Patience
    Romney, Elizabeth
    Richley, Michael
    Gebb, Juliana
    Rosner, Mara
    Dar, Pe'er
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (14) : 2415 - 2421
  • [8] Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Estimated Fetal Weight and Isolated Abdominal Circumference for the Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction
    Whitham, Megan D.
    Reynolds, David M.
    Urban, Amanda R.
    Ennen, Christopher S.
    Dudley, Donald J.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (02) : 477 - 485
  • [9] Comparing outcomes of fetal growth restriction defined by estimated fetal weight versus isolated abdominal circumference
    Griffin, Myah M.
    Mehta-Lee, Shilpi S.
    Penfield, Christina A.
    Roman, Ashley S.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (01) : 449 - 452
  • [10] The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age
    Stefanelli, Sergio
    Groom, Katie M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 54 (02) : 126 - 131