Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prosiatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience

被引:26
作者
Tholomier, Come [1 ]
Bienz, Marc [1 ]
Hueber, Pierre-Alain [1 ]
Quoc Dien Trinh [1 ]
El Hakim, Assaad [1 ]
Alhathal, Naif [1 ]
Lebeau, Thiery [1 ]
Benayoun, Serge [1 ]
Valdivieso, Roger [1 ]
Liberman, Dan [1 ]
Saad, Fred [1 ]
Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste [1 ]
Widmer, Hugues [1 ]
Begin, Louis [1 ]
Latour, Mathieu [1 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Montreal, PQ H2X 1N8, Canada
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2014年 / 8卷 / 5-6期
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; PROSTATE-CANCER; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SEXUAL OUTCOMES; MEN; RECOVERY; RATES; RISK;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.2016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: While RARP (robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy) has become the predominant surgical approach to treat localized prostate cancer, there is little Canadian data on its oncological and functional outcomes. We describe the largest RARP experience in Canada. Methods: Data from 722 patients who underwent RARP performed by 4 fellowship-trained surgeons were collected prospectively from October 2006 to December 2013. Preoperative characteristics, as well as postoperative surgical and pathological outcomes, were collected. Functional and oncological outcomes were also assessed up to 72 months postoperative. Results: The median follow-up (Q1-Q3) was 18 months (9-36). The D'Amico risk stratification distribution was 31% low, 58% intermediate and 11% high-risk. The median operative time was 178 minutes (142-205), blood loss was 200 mL (150-300) and the postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (1-23). The transfusion rate was only 1.0%. There were 0.7% major (Clavien III-IV) and 10.1% minor (Clavien I-II) postoperative complications, with no mortality. Pathologically, 445 men (70%) were stage pT2, of which 81(18%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). In addition, 189 patients (30%) were stage pT3 and 87 (46%) with PSM. Urinary continence (0-pads/day) returned at 3, 6, and 12 months for 68%, 80%, and 90% of patients, respectively. Overall, the potency rates (successful penetration) for all men at 6, 12, and 24 months were 37%, 52%, and 59%, respectively. Biochemical recurrence was observed in 28 patients (4.9%), and 14 patients (2.4%) were referred for early salvage radiotherapy. In total, 49 patients (8.4%) underwent radiotherapy and/or hormonal therapy. Conclusions: This study shows similar results compared to other high-volume RARP programs. Being the largest RARP experience in Canada, we report that RARP is safe with acceptable oncologic outcomes in a Canadian setting.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot [J].
Abbou, CC ;
Hoznek, A ;
Salomon, L ;
Olsson, LE ;
Lobontiu, A ;
Saint, F ;
Cicco, A ;
Antiphon, P ;
Chopin, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (06) :1964-1966
[2]   Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Woo, D ;
Eichel, L ;
Lee, DI ;
Edwards, R ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (05) :819-822
[3]   Perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes of the first robotic prostatectomy program in Quebec: Single fellowship-trained surgeon's experience of 250 cases [J].
Al-Hathal, Naif ;
El-Hakim, Assaad .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (9-10) :326-332
[4]   A cost-analysis comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy: the McMaster Institute of Urology experience [J].
Al-Shaiji, Tariq F. ;
Kanaroglou, Niki ;
Thoma, Achilleas ;
Prowse, Connie ;
Comondore, Vikram ;
Orovan, William ;
Piercey, Kevin ;
Whelan, Paul ;
Winter, Leo ;
Matsumoto, Edward D. .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 4 (04) :237-241
[5]   Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan ;
Alibhai, Shabbir ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Zlotta, Alexandre ;
Nesbitt, Michael ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :145-150
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Canadian Cancer Statistics 2013
[7]   Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy - Assessment after 2766 procedures [J].
Badani, Ketan K. ;
Kaul, Sanjeev ;
Menon, Mani .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (09) :1951-1958
[8]   Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy:: The early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up [J].
Bentas, W ;
Wolfram, M ;
Jones, J ;
Bräutigam, R ;
Kramer, W ;
Binder, J .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (02) :175-181
[9]   Robotic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches [J].
Berryhill, Roy, Jr. ;
Jhaveri, Jay ;
Yadav, Rajiv ;
Leung, Robert ;
Rao, Sandhya ;
El-Hakim, Assaad ;
Tewari, Ashutosh .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :15-23
[10]   Scoring Correspondence in Outcomes Related to Erectile Dysfunction Treatment on a 4-Point Scale (SCORE-4) [J].
Cappelleri, Joseph C. ;
Bushmakin, Andrew G. ;
Symonds, Tara ;
Schnetzler, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (03) :809-819