IoT Protocols Comparison for Wireless Sensors Network Applied to Marine Environment Acoustic Monitoring

被引:10
|
作者
Durante, G. [1 ]
Beccaro, W. [1 ]
Peres, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Engn Sistemas Eletron, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Internet of Things; Underwater technology; Machine-to-machine; Acoustic sensors; Wireless sensor networks; INTERNET; LIGHTWEIGHT; THINGS;
D O I
10.1109/TLA.2018.8795107
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There is a growing interest to analyze acoustic marine environment. Underwater sounds can indicate the natural marine activity, as well as the influence of human activities in the aquatic ecosystems. Several kinds of electronic devices can be used to monitor the marine sound, but normally these devices work autonomously, without communication with other equipment, which makes difficult the real-time monitoring. In addition, the usual equipment is normally expensive and highly complex. Thus, for the design of wireless sensor network (WSN) applied to marine monitoring, it is important to develop systems with good energy autonomy and efficient data processing and communication. However, it is not well established the best WSN communication protocol for applications in hostile environments. Some protocols used for Internet of Things (IoT) applications have emerged recently as alternative for efficient communication between nodes and gateways. This work presents a comparison between two IoT application protocols: CoAP and MQTT-SN. We have verified that the MQTT-SN protocol has some advantages, such as: its latency is 30% lower compared with CoAP, the power consumption is 10% lower than CoAP, and the traffic flow is 2.15 times larger than CoAP, for an architecture with 40 wireless nodes.
引用
收藏
页码:2673 / 2679
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IOT Based Wireless Sensor Network for Air Pollution Monitoring
    Chaturvedi, Ajay
    Shrivastava, Laxmi
    2020 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES (CSNT 2020), 2020, : 78 - 81
  • [32] Remote monitoring system with wireless sensors module for room environment
    Chung, WY
    Oh, SJ
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2006, 113 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [33] Agricultural Environment Monitoring System using Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT
    Marques, Goncalo
    Pitarma, Rui
    2018 13TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2018,
  • [34] Comparison of Wireless Network Simulators with Multihop Wireless Network Testbed in Corridor Environment
    Khattak, Rabiullah
    Chaltseva, Anna
    Riliskis, Laurynas
    Bodin, Ulf
    Osipov, Evgeny
    WIRED/WIRELESS INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 6649 : 80 - 91
  • [35] Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks in Marine Environment Monitoring: A Survey
    Xu, Guobao
    Shen, Weiming
    Wang, Xianbin
    SENSORS, 2014, 14 (09): : 16932 - 16954
  • [36] MAC protocols in Wireless Sensor Network: a Energy Comparison Analysis
    Sergi, Claudia
    Turiaco, Natalia
    De Rango, Floriano
    2021 29TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR), 2021,
  • [37] Network Performance Comparison of VPN Protocols on Wired and Wireless Networks
    Narayan, Shaneel
    Williams, Cameron J.
    Hart, Daniel K.
    Qualtrough, Max W.
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS (ICCCI), 2015,
  • [38] Performance comparison of ad hoc wireless network routing protocols
    Ehsan, H
    Uzmi, ZA
    INMIC 2004: 8TH INTERNATIONAL MULTITOPIC CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 457 - 465
  • [39] A Comparison of Blockchain-Based Wireless Sensor Network Protocols
    Primo, Abena
    2020 11TH IEEE ANNUAL UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (UEMCON), 2020, : 793 - 799
  • [40] A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed
    Pham, Nam N.
    Youn, Jon
    Won, Chulho
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSOR NETWORKS, UBIQUITOUS, AND TRUSTWORTHY COMPUTING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 276 - +