Importance of comorbidities in comatose survivors of shockable and non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with target temperature management

被引:5
|
作者
Salam, Idrees [1 ,2 ]
Thomsen, Jakob Hartvig [1 ]
Kjaergaard, Jesper [1 ]
Bro-Jeppesen, John [1 ]
Frydland, Martin [1 ]
Winther-Jensen, Matilde [1 ]
Kober, Lars [1 ]
Wanscher, Michael [3 ]
Hassager, Christian [1 ]
Soholm, Helle [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol 2142, Heart Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Cent Denmark Reg Hosp Horsens, Dept Anaesthesiol, Horsens, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Heart Ctr, Dept Thorac Anaesthesiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Zealand Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Non-shockable primary rhythm; shockable primary rhythm; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; comorbidity; mortality; Targeted Temperature Management; RESUSCITATION COUNCIL GUIDELINES; CHRONIC HEALTH CONDITIONS; VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; ASSOCIATION; IMPUTATION; IMPROVE; RHYTHMS; SWEDEN;
D O I
10.1080/14017431.2018.1450991
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. Comorbidity prior to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and primary rhythm in relation to survival is not well established. We aimed to assess the prognostic importance of comorbidity in relation to primary rhythm in OHCA-patients treated with Target Temperature Management (TTM). Design. Consecutive comatose survivors of OHCA treated with TTM in hospitals in the Copenhagen area between 2002-2011 were included. Utstein-based pre- and in-hospital data collection was performed. Data on comorbidity was obtained from The Danish National Patient Register and patient charts, assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results. A total of 666 patients were included. A third (n=233, 35%) presented with non-shockable rhythm, and they were less often male (64% vs. 82%, p < .001), and OHCA in public, witnessed OHCA, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were less common compared to patients with a shockable primary rhythm (public: 27% vs. 48%, p < .001, witnessed: 79% vs. 90%, p < .001, bystander CPR: 47% vs. 63%, p < .001). 30-day mortality was 62% compared to 28% in patients with non-shockable and shockable rhythm, respectively. By Cox-regression analyses, any comorbidity (CCI 1) was the only factor independently associated with 30-day mortality in patients with non-shockable rhythm (HR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.2-2.9), p < .01), whereas in patients with shockable rhythm comorbidity was not associated with outcome after adjustment for prognostic factors (HR = 0.82 (0.55-1.2), p = .34). No significant interaction between primary rhythm and comorbidity in terms of mortality was present. Conclusion. A higher comorbidity burden was independently associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate in patients presenting with non-shockable primary rhythm but not in patients with shockable rhythm.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comorbidity as a risk factor in survivors of non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with hypothermia
    Thomsen, J. H.
    Soeholm, H.
    Hassager, C.
    Bro-Jeppesen, J.
    Lippert, F.
    Koeber, L.
    Wanscher, M.
    Kjaergaard, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 315 - 315
  • [2] Epinephrine administration in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Jouffroy, R.
    Saade, A.
    Alexandre, P.
    Philippe, P.
    Carli, P.
    Vivien, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (03): : 387 - 390
  • [3] Demystifying non-shockable rhythms in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Kosmopoulos, Marinos
    Yannopoulos, Demetris
    RESUSCITATION, 2022, 181 : 119 - 120
  • [4] Clinical predictors of shockable versus non-shockable rhythms in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Wissenberg, Mads
    Hansen, Steen Moller
    Lippert, Freddy K.
    Lang-Jensen, Torsten
    Hendriksen, Ole Mazur
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Christensen, Erika Frischknecht
    Christiansen, Christian Fynbo
    RESUSCITATION, 2016, 108 : 40 - 47
  • [5] Effect of Shock Delivery After Conversion to Shockable Arrest From Out-of-Hospital Non-shockable Cardiac Arrest
    Yagi, Tsukasa
    Nagao, Ken
    Tachibana, Eizo
    Nishikawa, Kei
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Shirai, Shinichi
    Takayama, Morimasa
    Nonogi, Hiroshi
    Kimura, Takeshi
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [6] Prognostic Value of the Conversion to a Shockable Rhythm in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients with Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm
    Han, Kap Su
    Lee, Sung Woo
    Lee, Eui Jung
    Kim, Su Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [7] Bystander automated external defibrillator application in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Pollack, Ross A.
    Brown, Siobhan P.
    May, Susanne
    Rea, Tom
    Kudenchuk, Peter J.
    Weisfeldt, Myron L.
    RESUSCITATION, 2019, 137 : 168 - 174
  • [8] Outcome prediction in comatose cardiac arrest patients with initial shockable and non-shockable rhythms
    Wimmer, Henning
    Stensones, Stine Haheim
    Benth, Jurate Saltyte
    Lundqvist, Christofer
    Andersen, Geir O.
    Draegni, Tomas
    Sunde, Kjetil
    Nakstad, Espen Rostrup
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 68 (02) : 263 - 273
  • [9] AED Application in Non-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Does Not Reduce Survival
    Pollack, Ross A.
    Brown, Siobhan P.
    Rea, Thomas
    Kudenchuk, Peter J.
    Weisfeldt, Myron L.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [10] Prognostic Factors for Re-Arrest with Shockable Rhythm during Target Temperature Management in Out-Of-Hospital Shockable Cardiac Arrest Patients
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    Lee, Dong Hun
    Lee, Byung Kook
    Youn, Chun Song
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Kim, Su Jin
    Kim, Yong Hwan
    Kim, Won Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (09)