A Consensus Model to Detect and Manage Noncooperative Behaviors in Large-Scale Group Decision Making

被引:459
作者
Palomares, Ivan [1 ]
Martinez, Luis [1 ]
Herrera, Francisco [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen 23071, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Comp & Informat Technol, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Consensus; e-democracy; fuzzy clustering; group decision making (GDM); preference relation; self-organizing maps (SOMs); social networks; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; INITIALIZATION; ALGORITHMS; SETS;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2262769
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Consensus reaching processes in group decision making attempt to reach a mutual agreement among a group of decision makers before making a common decision. Different consensus models have been proposed by different authors in the literature to facilitate consensus reaching processes. Classical models focus on solving group decision making problems where few decision makers participate. However, nowadays, societal and technological trends that demand the management of larger scales of decision makers, such as e-democracy and social networks, add a new requirement to the solution of consensus-based group decision making problems. Dealing with such large groups implies the need for mechanisms to detect decision makers' noncooperative behaviors in consensus, which might bias the consensus reaching process. This paper presents a consensus model suitable to manage large scales of decision makers, which incorporates a fuzzy clustering-based scheme to detect and manage individual and subgroup noncooperative behaviors. The model is complemented with a visual analysis tool of the overall consensus reaching process based on self-organizing maps, which facilitates the monitoring of the process performance across the time. The consensus model presented is aimed to the solution of consensus processes involving large groups.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 530
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]  
Orlovsky S. A., 1978, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V1, P155, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90001-5
[32]   An attitude-driven web consensus support system for heterogeneous group decision making [J].
Palomares, Ivan ;
Rodriguez, Rosa M. ;
Martinez, Luis .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (01) :139-149
[33]   A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments [J].
Parreiras, R. O. ;
Ekel, P. Ya. ;
Martini, J. S. C. ;
Palhares, R. M. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2010, 180 (07) :1075-1089
[34]   A Linguistic Approach to Influencing Decision Behavior [J].
Petry, Frederick E. ;
Yager, Ronald R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2012, 20 (02) :248-261
[35]   Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making [J].
Rodriguez, Rosa M. ;
Martinez, Luis ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2012, 20 (01) :109-119
[36]   Fuzzy sets and decision analysis [J].
Roubens, M .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 90 (02) :199-206
[37]  
Saint S., 1994, RULES REACHING CONSE
[38]   Decision Making in Social Networks [J].
Squillante, Massimo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (03) :225-225
[39]   From Social Network (Centralized vs. Decentralized) to Collective Decision-Making (Unshared vs. Shared Consensus) [J].
Sueur, Cedric ;
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis ;
Petit, Odile .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02)
[40]  
Tanino T., 1988, NONCONVENTIONAL PREF, P54, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_4