SHOULD ORAL IMPLANTS BE SPLINTED IN A MANDIBULAR IMPLANT-SUPPORTED FIXED COMPLETE DENTURE? A 3-DIMENSIONAL-MODEL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

被引:13
作者
Alvarez-Arenal, Angel [1 ]
Brizuela-Velasco, Aritza [1 ]
DeLlanos-Lanchares, Hector [1 ]
Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oviedo, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Occlus, Oviedo, Spain
关键词
STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; OCCLUSAL OVERLOAD; DENTAL IMPLANT; BONE; PROSTHESIS; FULL; SURVIVAL; FLEXURE; ARCHES; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. The design of a mandibular fixed complete denture can influence periimplant bone loss. However, the design that transfers the greatest stress to the periimplant bone is not well documented. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to assess the stress distribution associated with splinted and nonsplinted implant-supported mandibular fixed complete denture designs. Material and methods. Three-dimensional finite element models simulating 6 osseointegrated implants were created in the mandible to support a cobalt-chromium alloy and feldspathic porcelain veneering framework. One model simulated a 1-piece framework, and the other models simulated 2-piece and 3-piece frameworks. Axial and oblique loads were applied to the frameworks. Results. For all the models, the greatest stress values were recorded in the periimplant bone of posterior implants, with differences between the left and right sides. The axial load transferred greater stress values to the periimplant bone than did the oblique load. The lowest periimplant bone stress values were observed in the 3-piece framework model at all implant locations, with the exception of implants placed in the canine region. Conclusions. A framework separated into 3 pieces transfers the as stress to the periimplant bone. (J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:508-514)
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 514
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Split-frame implant prosthesis designed to compensate for mandibular flexure: A clinical report [J].
Paez, CY ;
Barco, T ;
Roushdy, S ;
Andres, C .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 89 (04) :341-343
[22]  
Qian LH, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P877
[23]  
RANGERT B, 1989, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V4, P241
[24]  
Romeo E, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P247
[25]   Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study [J].
Romeo, E ;
Lops, D ;
Margutti, E ;
Ghisolfi, M ;
Chiapasco, M ;
Vogel, G .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (03) :303-311
[26]   Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown [J].
Sevimay, M ;
Turhan, F ;
Kiliçarslan, MA ;
Eskitascioglu, G .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 93 (03) :227-234
[27]  
Stasinopoulou I, 2013, J PROSTHET DENT, V110, P303, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60380-7
[28]   To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review [J].
Stoumpis, C. ;
Kohal, R-J. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 38 (11) :857-869
[29]   Determination of elastic properties of metal alloys and dental porcelains [J].
Suansuwan, N ;
Swain, MV .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (02) :133-139
[30]  
Sütpideler M, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P819