Financial Impact of Liver Sharing and Organ Procurement Organizations' Experience With Share 35: Implications for National Broader Sharing

被引:16
作者
Fernandez, H. [1 ]
Weber, J. [2 ]
Barnes, K. [3 ]
Wright, L. [3 ]
Levy, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor All St Med Ctr, Ft Worth, TX USA
[2] Ctr Organ Recovery & Educ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Southwest Transplant Alliance, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
MELD EXCEPTION GUIDELINES; DISEASE MELD; UNITED-STATES; ALLOCATION; MODEL; TRANSPLANTATION; POLICY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.13436
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Share 35 policy for organ allocation, which was adopted in June 2013, allocates livers regionally for candidates with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores of 35 or greater. The authors analyzed the costs resulting from the increased movement of allografts related to this new policy. Using a sample of nine organ procurement organizations, representing 17% of the US population and 19% of the deceased donors in 2013, data were obtained on import and export costs before Share 35 implementation (June 15, 2012, to June 14, 2013) and after Share 35 implementation (June 15, 2013, to June 14, 2014). Results showed that liver import rates increased 42%, with an increased cost of 51%, while export rates increased 112%, with an increased cost of 127%. When the costs of importing and exporting allografts were combined, the total change in costs for all nine organ procurement organizations was $11 011 321 after Share 35 implementation. Extrapolating these costs nationally resulted in an increased yearly cost of $68 820 756 by population or $55 056 605 by number of organ donors. Any alternative allocation proposal needs to account for the financial implications to the transplant infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 291
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Exception point applications for 15 points: An unintended consequence of the Share 15 policy [J].
Bittermann, Therese ;
Makar, George ;
Goldberg, David .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (11) :1302-1309
[2]  
Cholongitas E, 2012, ANN GASTROENTEROL, V25, P6
[3]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CHILD-TURCOTTE CRITERIA IN MEDICALLY TREATED CIRRHOSIS [J].
CHRISTENSEN, E ;
SCHLICHTING, P ;
FAUERHOLDT, L ;
GLUUD, C ;
ANDERSEN, PK ;
JUHL, E ;
POULSEN, H ;
TYGSTRUP, N .
HEPATOLOGY, 1984, 4 (03) :430-435
[4]  
Department of Health and Human Services, 1998, FED REG, V63, P16296
[5]   Are There Better Guidelines for Allocation in Liver Transplantation? A Novel Score Targeting Justice and Utility in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Era [J].
Dutkowski, Philipp ;
Oberkofler, Christian E. ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Puhan, Milo A. ;
Schadde, Erik ;
Muellhaupt, Beat ;
Geier, Andreas ;
Clavien, Pierre A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (05) :745-753
[6]   The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Harper, A ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Lake, J ;
Edwards, E ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R ;
Turcotte, J ;
Teperman, L .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) :851-858
[7]  
FREEMAN RB, 2005, TRANSPLANTATION LIVE, P63
[8]   Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception guidelines: Results and recommendations from the MELD exception study group and conference (MESSAGE) for the approval of patients who need liver transplantation with diseases not considered by the standard MELD formula [J].
Freeman, Richard B., Jr. ;
Gish, Robert G. ;
Harper, Ann ;
Davis, Gary L. ;
Vierling, John ;
Lieblein, Leslie ;
Klintmalm, Goran ;
Blazek, Jamie ;
Hunter, Robert ;
Punch, Jeffrey .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (12) :S128-S136
[9]   Addressing Geographic Disparities in Liver Transplantation Through Redistricting [J].
Gentry, S. E. ;
Massie, A. B. ;
Cheek, S. W. ;
Lentine, K. L. ;
Chow, E. H. ;
Wickliffe, C. E. ;
Dzebashvili, N. ;
Salvalaggio, P. R. ;
Schnitzler, M. A. ;
Axelrod, D. A. ;
Segev, D. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (08) :2052-2058
[10]   Fast-tracking and fairness: Getting organ offers quickly to candidates who will accept them [J].
Gentry, Sommer E. ;
Segev, Dorry L. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 (04) :358-359