Definition of a Risk Assessment Model within a European Interoperable Database Platform (EID) for Cultural Heritage

被引:30
作者
Appiotti, Federica [1 ]
Assumma, Vanessa [2 ]
Bottero, Marta [2 ]
Campostrini, Pierpaolo [3 ]
Datola, Giulia [2 ]
Lombardi, Patrizia [2 ]
Rinaldi, Enrico [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iuav Venezia, Dept Architecture & Arts, Venice, Italy
[2] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Turin, Italy
[3] Consortium Managing Res Act Venice Lagoon, CORILA, Venice, Italy
关键词
cultural heritage; risk analysis; evaluation model; multicriteria analysis; architecture; indicators and indices; MANAGEMENT; SMARTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.001
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the topics related both to the safeguard and the valorization of cultural heritage and cultural assets are getting more attention in the political agenda. Innovative approaches to implement both the risk analysis and the resilience assessment are ever more required. This paper illustrates an original approach, concerning the development of a risk assessment model for cultural assets, with reference to fire, earthquake and flood. The proposed model includes specific evaluation tools, that are based on parameters and indicators related to the factors of hazard and vulnerability for the three considered types of risk. The multi-dimensional set of indicators is used to get synthetics indices, through a multicriteria approach. Furthermore, this evaluation is supported by specific questionnaires to include in the assessment model the opinion of different experts and stakeholders to introduce the indicators weights. The results of this model are represented by specific evaluation tools which can be implemented in the risk assessment of cultural assets in different specific situations. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Assessing Transboundary Wildfire Exposure in the Southwestern United States
    Ager, Alan A.
    Palaiologou, Palaiologos
    Evers, Cody R.
    Day, Michelle A.
    Barros, Ana M. G.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (10) : 2105 - 2127
  • [2] The study of natural disasters, 1977-1997: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge
    Alexander, D
    [J]. DISASTERS, 1997, 21 (04) : 284 - 304
  • [3] Statistical Modeling of Fire Occurrence Using Data from the Thoku, Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
    Anderson, Dana
    Davidson, Rachel A.
    Himoto, Keisuke
    Scawthorn, Charles
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (02) : 378 - 395
  • [4] Proposal for a new environmental risk assessment methodology in cultural heritage protection
    Andretta, Massimo
    Coppola, Floriana
    Modelli, Alberto
    Santopuoli, Nicola
    Seccia, Leonardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2017, 23 : 22 - 32
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1994, WORLD C NAT DIS RED
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2008, NTC 2008-Decreto Ministeriale 14/1/2008 - norme tecniche per le costruzioni, P428, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110247190.153
  • [10] Appiotti F., 2018, RIV Rass. Ital. di Valutazione, P121, DOI [10.3280/RIV2018-071007, DOI 10.3280/RIV2018-071007]