How Does Culture Shape Creativity? A Mini-Review

被引:68
作者
Sha, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Chenchen [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [3 ]
Gu, Ting [4 ]
Yuan, Yuan [5 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Normal Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guilin, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Sch Art, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Changzhou Art Vocat Coll Jiangsu Prov, Dept Art Design, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[4] City Vocat Coll Jiangsu, Dept Informat Media, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Normal Univ Special Educ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Special Childrens Impairment, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
culture; creativity; conceptualization; thinking pattern; creative process; IMPLICIT THEORIES; MULTICULTURAL EXPERIENCE; HONG-KONG; INSIGHT; ETHNICITY; THINKING; CHINESE; DICHOTOMY; RATINGS; GENDER;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine how culture shapes creativity by reviewing empirical findings across diverse studies. The impact of culture on creativity is typically manifested in three ways: (1) people from different cultures or settings have distinct implicit and/or explicit conceptions of creativity; (2) individuals from cifferent cultures, particularly those from individualist and collectivist cutting, show differences in preferred creative processes and creative processing modes (e.g., usefulness seems more important than novelty in the East, whereas novelty seems equally important as usefulness, if not more so, in the West) when they are engaged in creative endeavors; (3) creativity may be assessed using different measures based on culture-related contents or materials, and findings are accurate only when culturally appropriate or culturally fair measures are used. Potential implications and future directions are also proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]   Problem Finding and Contradiction: Examining the Relationship Between Naive Dialectical Thinking, Ethnicity, and Creativity [J].
Paletz, Susannah B. F. ;
Peng, Kaiping .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 21 (2-3) :139-151
[42]   Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research [J].
Plucker, JA ;
Beghetto, RA ;
Dow, GT .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 39 (02) :83-96
[43]  
RHODES M, 1961, PHI DELTA KAPPAN, V42, P305
[44]   USE OF THE TORRANCE TESTS OF CREATIVE-THINKING IN AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY OF CREATIVITY IN HONG-KONG PRIMARY-SCHOOL CHILDREN - A CROSS-CULTURAL-COMPARISON [J].
RUDOWICZ, E ;
LOK, D ;
KITTO, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 30 (04) :417-430
[45]   Compatibility of Chinese and creative personalities [J].
Rudowicz, E ;
Yue, XD .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2002, 14 (3-4) :387-394
[46]   Concepts of creativity: Smilarities and differences among mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese [J].
Rudowicz, E ;
Yue, XD .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2000, 34 (03) :175-192
[47]  
Rudowicz Elisabeth., 2003, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, V47, P273, DOI DOI 10.1080/00313830308602
[48]   BIRTH-ORDER AND DIVERGENT THINKING [J].
RUNCO, MA ;
BAHLEDA, MD .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :119-125
[49]   "Big C, Little c" Creativity as a False Dichotomy: Reality is not Categorical [J].
Runco, Mark A. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 26 (01) :131-132
[50]   The Standard Definition of Creativity [J].
Runco, Mark A. ;
Jaeger, Garrett J. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2012, 24 (01) :92-96