Predicting Wildfire using Live Fuel Moisture Content with Machine Learning

被引:2
作者
Cheruku, Ramalingaswamy [1 ]
Kohli, Aman [1 ]
Kodali, Prakash [2 ]
Kavati, Ilaiah [1 ]
Sureshbabu, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIT Warangal, Dept CSE, Hanamkonda, Telangana, India
[2] NIT Warangal, Dept ECE, Hanamkonda, Telangana, India
来源
2022 IEEE 19TH INDIA COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, INDICON | 2022年
关键词
K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN); Support Vector Machine (SVM); Random Forest; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Live Fuel Moisture Content; Remote Sensing;
D O I
10.1109/INDICON56171.2022.10039960
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Forest fires are responsible for significant losses to societies, ecosystems, and economies worldwide. To keep a check on these losses and to avoid wildfires, predicting the occurrence of these forest fires are important because these can help in wildfire management and prevention. In recent times, with the availability of real time high resolution remote sensing satellite data over larger geographies, it is becoming easier to study geologic features of our planet. One such example is the live fuel moisture content (LFMC), which is defined as the "mass of vegetation water per unit dry biomass", a crucial factor determinant of wildfire risk. Using the Live Fuel Moisture Content in combination with ground truth wildfire data from the United States Geological Survey, I predict whether there will be a fire in the near future within a 8 km grid over the area of interest using supervised machine learning models such as KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and Neural Networks. We conducted two experiments, using a single image within 15 days of a fire, and a combination of 3 images within 45 days of a fire. Our results show that the random forest performs best with an accuracy of 76.06% for a single image, and 75.07% for multiple images.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management
    Jain, Piyush
    Coogan, Sean C. P.
    Subramanian, Sriram Ganapathi
    Crowley, Mark
    Taylor, Steve
    Flannigan, Mike D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2020, 28 (04): : 478 - 505
  • [2] A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management
    Miller, Carol
    Ager, Alan A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2013, 22 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [3] Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825
  • [4] Probability based models for estimation of wildfire risk
    Preisler, HK
    Brillinger, DR
    Burgan, RE
    Benoit, JW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2004, 13 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [5] SAR-enhanced mapping of live fuel moisture content
    Rao, Krishna
    Williams, A. Park
    Flefil, Jacqueline Fortin
    Konings, Alexandra G.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 245
  • [6] A Machine Learning-Based Approach for Wildfire Susceptibility Mapping. The Case Study of the Liguria Region in Italy
    Tonini, Marj
    D'Andrea, Mirko
    Biondi, Guido
    Degli Esposti, Silvia
    Trucchia, Andrea
    Fiorucci, Paolo
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [7] Welty J., 2020, COMBINED WILDFIRE DA, DOI [10.5066/P9Z2VVRT, DOI 10.5066/P9Z2VVRT]
  • [8] Forest Fire Susceptibility Modeling Using a Convolutional Neural Network for Yunnan Province of China
    Zhang, Guoli
    Wang, Ming
    Liu, Kai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2019, 10 (03) : 386 - 403