Anterior Cervical Fusion Assessment Using Reconstructed Computed Tomographic Scans Surgical Confirmation of 254 Segments

被引:38
作者
Song, Kwang-Sup [1 ]
Chaiwat, Piyaskulkaew [2 ]
Kim, Han Jo [2 ]
Mesfin, Addisu [2 ]
Park, Sang-Min [1 ]
Riew, K. Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul 156756, South Korea
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
anterior cervical arthrodesis; pseudoarthrosis; CT scan; reliability; fusion assessment; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; CT; PSEUDOARTHROSIS;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective study developing diagnostic criteria. Objective. To validate 2 computed tomography-based findings, extragraft bone bridging (ExGBB) and intragraft bone bridging (InGBB), as diagnostic criteria for anterior cervical fusion using subsequent surgical confirmation and to demonstrate the different diagnostic accuracy on the basis of the graft material used. Summary of Background Data. The accuracy and the methodology for evaluating bone bridging on computed tomographic scans to determine anterior cervical fusion status have not been validated or standardized. Methods. One hundred ten patients with 254 surgically explored segments along with reconstructed computed tomographic scans were included. Bone bridging at each cervical level was assessed for ExGBB and InGBB. ExGBB was defined as complete cortical bridging at any peripheral margins (anterior, posterior, left, or right) of the operated disc space, outside of the graft. InGBB was defined as cortical or trabecular bridging within the confines of the graft only. ExGBB and InGBB were serially evaluated on reformatted coronal and sagittal views by 3 independent raters. The reliabilities and validities correlated with surgical exploration were evaluated. Results. Surgical exploration revealed 123 fused and 131 pseudarthrosis segments. The reliability of 3 raters showed near perfect agreement for ExGBB and substantial agreement for InGBB. ExGBB also had higher validity for all raters than did InGBB. The autocortical graft group had the highest accuracy for both InGBB and ExGBB, with both values being nearly identical. The allograft group had the next highest validity values. For the cage group, InGBB had the lowest specificity (53.2%) and positive predictive value (35.5%), whereas ExGBB had 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Conclusion. ExGBB seems to be a far more reliable and accurate to determine anterior cervical fusion. The diagnostic criteria using bone bridging should be different based on the intradiscal materials. With cages in particular, InGBB seems unreliable and ExGBB is necessary to determine anterior cervical fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:2171 / 2177
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Anterior cervical fusion assessment - Surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation
    Buchowski, Jacob M.
    Liu, Gabriel
    Bunmaprasert, Torphong
    Rose, Peter S.
    Riew, K. Daniel
    [J]. SPINE, 2008, 33 (11) : 1185 - 1191
  • [2] Burkus J K, 2001, Neurosurg Focus, V10, pE11
  • [3] Reliability and accuracy of fine-cut computed tomography scans to determine the status of anterior interbody fusions with metallic cages
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Schwender, James D.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Gornet, Matthew F.
    Ohno, Shuichiro
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) : 998 - 1002
  • [4] Anterior cervical fusion with interbody cage containing β-tricalcium phosphate augmented with plate fixation:: a prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up
    Dai, Li-Yang
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (05) : 698 - 705
  • [5] Ehrler DM, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P38
  • [6] Epstein Nancy E, 2002, Spine J, V2, P129, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00154-1
  • [7] Prospective Analysis of Imaging Prediction of Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Computed Tomography Versus Flexion-Extension Motion Analysis With Intraoperative Correlation
    Ghiselli, Gary
    Wharton, Nicholas
    Hipp, John A.
    Wong, David A.
    Jatana, Sanjay
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (06) : 463 - 468
  • [8] When is a spine fused?
    Goldstein, Christina
    Drew, Brian
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (03): : 306 - 313
  • [9] Radiographic assessment of cervical subaxial fusion
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Matz, Paul G.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Groff, Michael W.
    Heary, Robert F.
    Holly, Langston T.
    Ryken, Timothy C.
    Choudhri, Tanvir F.
    Vresilovic, Edward J.
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (02) : 221 - 227
  • [10] Use of polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the cervical spine: a radiographic analysis
    Klimo, Paul, Jr.
    Peelle, Michael W.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (12) : 959 - 966