The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View

被引:80
作者
Galbreath, Jeremy [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
boards of directors; corporate governance; corporate social responsibility; inside directors; time; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; SHORT-TERMISM; SUSTAINABILITY; ORIENTATION; MANAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP; DIRECTORS; AGENCY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.1922
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Time plays an important role in corporate social responsibility (CSR) decisions. In the context of time and the boardroom, the consideration of CSR can be affected by board structure. For example, because of considerable short-term pressures, this study posits that insiders on the board are less likely to prioritize the longer-term time horizons needed to affect CSR. Following this perspective, a hypothesis is put forth that insiders generally have temporal orientations that are more short term in nature and that they therefore have a negative effect on CSR. A study of 300 of Australia's largest firms confirmed this hypothesis. However, when inside director compensation linked to environmental and social metrics and inside director CSR training are introduced as moderating variables, their interactive effects lead to positive results: both positively moderate the negative insider-CSR relationship in environmental and social dimensions. The study contributes to a temporal view of boards of directors, as well as to corporate governance and CSR. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 370
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality [J].
Amran, Azlan ;
Lee, Shiau Ping ;
Devi, S. Susela .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (04) :217-235
[3]   Taking time to integrate temporal research [J].
Ancona, DG ;
Okhuysen, GA ;
Perlow, LA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (04) :512-529
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, DOI [10.1108/09513579610109987, DOI 10.1108/09513579610109987]
[5]  
[Anonymous], AM PROSPECT
[6]   Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment: Hospitals' use of impression management [J].
Arndt, M ;
Bigelow, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :494-522
[7]  
Ashkanasy N., 2004, CULTURE LEADERSHIP O, P282
[8]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[9]   Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders [J].
Barnea, Amir ;
Rubin, Amir .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (01) :71-86
[10]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816