The Role of Error Management Culture for Firm and Individual Innovativeness

被引:42
作者
Fischer, Sebastian [1 ]
Frese, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Mertins, Jennifer Clarissa [3 ]
Hardt-Gawron, Julia Verena [3 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Luneburg, Germany
[2] NUS Business Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Giessen, Giessen, Germany
来源
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE | 2018年 / 67卷 / 03期
关键词
BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE; SAFETY; CREATIVITY; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; FAILURE; R(WG); MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/apps.12129
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
To innovate at work is risky as every new endeavour is also error-prone. Therefore, the way errors are managed in organisations may be related to organisations' innovativeness. We studied error management culture as one important and often overlooked organisational culture factor hypothesised to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Error management culture implies that a firm accepts that people make errors and uses organizational practices related to communicating about errors, to sharing error knowledge, to helping in error situations, and to quickly detecting and handling errors to deal with errors (Van Dyck, Frese, Baer, & Sonnentag, , p. 1229). Our sample consists of 30 companies with N=227 employees. To decrease the problem of common method variance, we split the samples within each company into two subsamples: one subsample was used for the measurement of error management culture and the other one for the measure of organisational innovativeness. A multilevel structural equation modelling (MSEM) analysis showed error management culture to be related to organisational and individual innovativeness. Organisational innovativeness was a mediator for the relationship between error management culture and individual innovativeness. A potential implication is that organisations wanting to increase their innovativeness may need to examine their error management culture.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 453
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[2]  
Anderson NR, 1998, J ORGAN BEHAV, V19, P235, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ECONOMIST, P1
[5]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[6]  
Bellis M., 2015, VIAGRA WAS INVENTED
[7]   A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity [J].
Bledow, Ronald ;
Frese, Michael ;
Anderson, Neil ;
Erez, Miriam ;
Farr, James .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (03) :305-337
[8]   A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size [J].
Camisón-Zornoza, C ;
Lapiedra-Alcamí, R ;
Segarra-Ciprés, M ;
Boronat-Navarro, M .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (03) :331-361
[9]   Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups [J].
Cannon, MD ;
Edmondson, AC .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 22 :161-177
[10]   Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :234-246