Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning?

被引:24
|
作者
Wang, Xianliang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Heng [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong Ronald [1 ]
Hou, Qing [2 ]
Liao, Li [4 ]
Jiang, Bo [5 ]
Li, Yupeng [1 ]
Wang, Pei [3 ]
Lang, Jinyi [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, 1840 Old Spanish Trail, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Nucl Sci & Technol, Key Lab Radiat Phys & Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Global Oncol One, Houston, TX USA
[5] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiple CT optimization; Robust optimization; Adaptive planning; Intensity-modulated proton therapy; LUNG-CANCER; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; SENSITIVITY; MOTION; PLANS; MITIGATION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: We hypothesized that a plan's robustness to anatomical changes can be improved by optimizing with multiple CT scans of a patient. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan could be developed to meet dose criteria on both planning and adaptive CT plans. Material and methods: Eight lung cancer patients who underwent adaptive IMPT were retrospectively selected. Each patient had two CTs: a primary planning CT (PCT) and an adaptive planning CT (ACT), and IMPT plans associated with the scans. PCT and ACT were then used in combination to optimize one plan (MCT plan). The doses to the target and organs at risk from the PCT plan, ACT plan, P-ACT plan (PCT plan calculated on ACT data), and MCT plans calculated on both CTs were compared. Results: The MCT plan maintained the D95% on both CTs (mean, 65.99 Gy on PCT and 66.02 Gy on ACT). Target dose coverage on ACT was significantly better with the MCT plan than with the P-ACT plan (p = 0.01). MCT plans had slightly higher lung V20 (0.6%, p = 0.02) than did PCT plans. The various plans showed no statistically significant difference in heart and spinal cord dose. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an IMPT plan can meet the dose criteria on both PCT and ACT, and that MCT optimization can improve the plan's robustness to anatomical change. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Weekly robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oesophageal cancer
    Anakotta, R. Melissa
    van der Laan, Hans P.
    Visser, Sabine
    Ribeiro, Cassia O.
    Dieters, Margriet
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Both, Stefan
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    Knopf, Antje
    Muijs, Christina T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 151 : 66 - 72
  • [22] Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Gu, Wenbo
    Neph, Ryan
    Ruan, Dan
    Zou, Wei
    Dong, Lei
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : 3356 - 3370
  • [23] Technical Note: 4D robust optimization in small spot intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for distal esophageal carcinoma
    Feng, Hongying
    Shan, Jie
    Ashman, Jonathan B.
    Rule, William G.
    Bhangoo, Ronik S.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Chiang, Jennifer
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Wong, William W.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Sio, Terence T.
    Liu, Wei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (08) : 4636 - 4647
  • [24] Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Chen, Wei
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Trofimov, Alexei
    Madden, Thomas
    Kooy, Hanne
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    Craft, David
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03) : 591 - 608
  • [25] The influence of the optimization starting conditions on the robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy plans
    Albertini, F.
    Hug, E. B.
    Lomax, A. J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (10) : 2863 - 2878
  • [26] Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the postoperative irradiation of thymoma
    Franceschini, Davide
    Cozzi, Luca
    Loi, Mauro
    Franzese, Ciro
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Scorsetti, Marta
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (09) : 2267 - 2276
  • [27] Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Qiu, Zihang
    Olberg, Sven
    den Hertog, Dick
    Ajdari, Ali
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    Pursley, Jennifer
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (10)
  • [28] A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Seki, Kazuya
    Kogame, Shouki
    Tanaka, Sodai
    Kanehira, Takahiro
    Tamura, Masaya
    Takao, Seishin
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Kobashi, Keiji
    Kato, Fumi
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 : 23 - 29
  • [29] A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Fuji, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Yuichi
    Pu, Yuehu
    Tsukishima, Chihiro
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [30] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL PROTON RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED PROTON THERAPY, AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR TREATMENT OF PEDIATRIC CRANIOPHARYNGIOMAS
    Boehling, Nicholas S.
    Grosshans, David R.
    Bluett, Jaques B.
    Palmer, Matthew T.
    Song, Xiaofei
    Amos, Richard A.
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Woo, Shiao Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 643 - 652