Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning?

被引:24
|
作者
Wang, Xianliang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Heng [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong Ronald [1 ]
Hou, Qing [2 ]
Liao, Li [4 ]
Jiang, Bo [5 ]
Li, Yupeng [1 ]
Wang, Pei [3 ]
Lang, Jinyi [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, 1840 Old Spanish Trail, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Nucl Sci & Technol, Key Lab Radiat Phys & Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Global Oncol One, Houston, TX USA
[5] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词
Multiple CT optimization; Robust optimization; Adaptive planning; Intensity-modulated proton therapy; LUNG-CANCER; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; SENSITIVITY; MOTION; PLANS; MITIGATION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: We hypothesized that a plan's robustness to anatomical changes can be improved by optimizing with multiple CT scans of a patient. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan could be developed to meet dose criteria on both planning and adaptive CT plans. Material and methods: Eight lung cancer patients who underwent adaptive IMPT were retrospectively selected. Each patient had two CTs: a primary planning CT (PCT) and an adaptive planning CT (ACT), and IMPT plans associated with the scans. PCT and ACT were then used in combination to optimize one plan (MCT plan). The doses to the target and organs at risk from the PCT plan, ACT plan, P-ACT plan (PCT plan calculated on ACT data), and MCT plans calculated on both CTs were compared. Results: The MCT plan maintained the D95% on both CTs (mean, 65.99 Gy on PCT and 66.02 Gy on ACT). Target dose coverage on ACT was significantly better with the MCT plan than with the P-ACT plan (p = 0.01). MCT plans had slightly higher lung V20 (0.6%, p = 0.02) than did PCT plans. The various plans showed no statistically significant difference in heart and spinal cord dose. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an IMPT plan can meet the dose criteria on both PCT and ACT, and that MCT optimization can improve the plan's robustness to anatomical change. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Wang, Xianliang
    Zhu, Ronald
    Gunn, Brandon
    Frank, Steven J.
    Chang, Yu
    Li, Qin
    Yang, Kunyu
    Wu, Gang
    Liao, Li
    Li, Yupeng
    Chen, Mei
    Li, Heng
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 142 : 124 - 132
  • [2] Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
    Liu, Muyu
    Pang, Bo
    Chen, Shuoyan
    Zeng, Yiling
    Zhang, Qi
    Quan, Hong
    Chang, Yu
    Yang, Zhiyong
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2025, 202
  • [3] Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers
    Liu, Wei
    Frank, Steven J.
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Yupeng
    Park, Peter C.
    Dong, Lei
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Mohan, Radhe
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [4] A critical evaluation of worst case optimization methods for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy planning
    Fredriksson, Albin
    Bokrantz, Rasmus
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 48 - 58
  • [5] Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy
    Li, Yupeng
    Niemela, Perttu
    Liao, Li
    Jiang, Shengpeng
    Li, Heng
    Poenisch, Falk
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Siljamaki, Sami
    Vanderstraeten, Reynald
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Gillin, Michael
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4840 - 4847
  • [6] Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients
    Li, Heng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Park, Peter
    Liu, Wei
    Chang, Joe
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Frank, Steve
    Li, Yupeng
    Poenisch, Falk
    Mohan, Radhe
    Gillin, Michael
    Zhu, Ronald
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 114 (03) : 367 - 372
  • [7] Analytical incorporation of fractionation effects in probabilistic treatment planning for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Wahl, Niklas
    Hennig, Philipp
    Wieser, Hans-Peter
    Bangert, Mark
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1317 - 1328
  • [8] A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint
    Fan, Qingkun
    Zhao, Lewei
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Hu, Jie
    Lu, Xiliang
    Yang, Zhijian
    Zhang, Sheng
    Yang, Kunyu
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Liu, Gang
    Dai, Shuyang
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 6220 - 6230
  • [9] Reflections on beam configuration optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Rocha, Humberto
    Mohan, Radhe
    Lim, Gino
    Goudarzi, Hadis M.
    Ferreira, Brigida C.
    Dias, Joana M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (13)
  • [10] Anatomical robust optimization to account for nasal cavity filling variation during intensity-modulated proton therapy: a comparison with conventional and adaptive planning strategies
    van de Water, Steven
    Albertini, Francesca
    Weber, Damien C.
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (02)