共 50 条
Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning?
被引:24
|作者:
Wang, Xianliang
[1
,2
,3
]
Li, Heng
[1
]
Zhu, Xiaorong Ronald
[1
]
Hou, Qing
[2
]
Liao, Li
[4
]
Jiang, Bo
[5
]
Li, Yupeng
[1
]
Wang, Pei
[3
]
Lang, Jinyi
[3
]
Zhang, Xiaodong
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, 1840 Old Spanish Trail, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Nucl Sci & Technol, Key Lab Radiat Phys & Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Global Oncol One, Houston, TX USA
[5] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Tianjin, Peoples R China
关键词:
Multiple CT optimization;
Robust optimization;
Adaptive planning;
Intensity-modulated proton therapy;
LUNG-CANCER;
TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES;
ROBUST OPTIMIZATION;
RADIATION ONCOLOGY;
SENSITIVITY;
MOTION;
PLANS;
MITIGATION;
RANGE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.032
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background and purpose: We hypothesized that a plan's robustness to anatomical changes can be improved by optimizing with multiple CT scans of a patient. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan could be developed to meet dose criteria on both planning and adaptive CT plans. Material and methods: Eight lung cancer patients who underwent adaptive IMPT were retrospectively selected. Each patient had two CTs: a primary planning CT (PCT) and an adaptive planning CT (ACT), and IMPT plans associated with the scans. PCT and ACT were then used in combination to optimize one plan (MCT plan). The doses to the target and organs at risk from the PCT plan, ACT plan, P-ACT plan (PCT plan calculated on ACT data), and MCT plans calculated on both CTs were compared. Results: The MCT plan maintained the D95% on both CTs (mean, 65.99 Gy on PCT and 66.02 Gy on ACT). Target dose coverage on ACT was significantly better with the MCT plan than with the P-ACT plan (p = 0.01). MCT plans had slightly higher lung V20 (0.6%, p = 0.02) than did PCT plans. The various plans showed no statistically significant difference in heart and spinal cord dose. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an IMPT plan can meet the dose criteria on both PCT and ACT, and that MCT optimization can improve the plan's robustness to anatomical change. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文