A multidimensional framework to inform stakeholder engagement in the science and management of invasive and pest animal species

被引:18
作者
Carter, Lucy [1 ]
Mankad, Aditi [1 ]
Zhang, Airong [2 ]
Curnock, Matthew, I [3 ]
Pollard, Chris R. J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] CSIRO Hlth & Biosecur, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] CSIRO Land & Water, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Stirling, Fac Nat Sci, Biol & Environm Sci, Stirling, Scotland
[5] Forest Res, Northern Res Stn, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Stakeholder engagement; Risk perceptions; Public attitudes; Social and ethical considerations; Human dimensions; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; ERADICATION PROGRAMS; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIAL LICENSE; PERCEIVED RISK; TRUST; CONSERVATION; DECISION; PARTICIPATION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10530-020-02391-6
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Beyond measurement of the ecological and economic impacts of invasive species and pest control on conservation, agricultural productivity and ecosystem services, there are multiple social and human dimensions which influence how stakeholders perceive and respond to research and management strategies. Given the increasing global attention on interdisciplinarity to enhance conservation research and management outcomes, we present a multidimensional framework to inform stakeholder engagement which consolidates current social sciences contributions to invasion science. Beyond unpacking the multiple drivers for considering the social dimensions of knowledge, emotions, trust and risk, we identify the ethical considerations for including social perspectives in research planning and decision-making. The framework captures the multiple personal, individual, institutional and governance dimensions of invasive species control and demonstrates how these dimensions relate. The paper concludes by discussing the implications for invasion science, policy and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 640
页数:16
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT [J].
ALHAKAMI, AS ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1085-1096
[3]   Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour [J].
Beedell, J ;
Rehman, T .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (01) :117-127
[4]   Public Engagement and the Impact of Fairness Perceptions on Decision Favorability and Acceptance [J].
Besley, John C. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2010, 32 (02) :256-280
[5]  
Böhm G, 2008, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V3, P73
[6]   Invasive species: The categorization of wildlife in science, policy, and wildlife management [J].
Boonman-Berson, Susan ;
Turnhout, Esther ;
van Tatenhove, Jan .
LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 38 :204-212
[7]  
Botterill L., 2004, RISK RISK PERCEPTION
[8]   Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland [J].
Bremner, Alison ;
Park, Kirsty .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 139 (3-4) :306-314
[9]   Selection of invasive wild pig countermeasures using multicriteria decision analysis [J].
Brondum, Matthew C. ;
Collier, Zachary A. ;
Luke, Christopher S. ;
Goatcher, Buddy L. ;
Linkov, Igor .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 574 :1164-1173
[10]  
Broom DonaldM., 1999, Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management, P309, DOI [10.1080/09670870701709939, DOI 10.1080/09670870701709939]