A dramaturgy of critical moments in transition: Understanding the dynamics of conflict in socio-political change

被引:35
作者
Yuana, Suci Lestari [1 ,2 ]
Sengers, Frans [1 ,5 ]
Boon, Wouter [1 ]
Hajer, Maarten A. [1 ,3 ]
Raven, Rob [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Social & Polit Sci, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Utrecht, Urban Futures Studios, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Monash Univ, Monash Sustainable Dev Inst, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Kings Coll London, Fac Social Sci & Publ Policy, London, England
关键词
Conflict in transition; Critical moments; Ridesharing; Digital innovation; Dramaturgy; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITION; SHARING ECONOMY; INNOVATION; DISCOURSE; FRAMEWORK; SPACE; POWER; OPPORTUNITY; STRATEGIES; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transitions are processes of major change and often come with conflict. There has been limited attention for the complex and multi-dimensional nature of conflict and its relation to trans formative change. To capture this complexity, we use the case of ridesharing in Indonesia and the dynamics of conflict that accompany the emergence of digital innovations in mobility services. We use the notion of 'critical moments' to be able to deepen the analysis on particular short timespans during which conflicts are particularly visible. For an in-depth understanding of these critical moments we look at the discursive enactment and mobilize dramaturgical analysis. We argue that: (1) multi-dimensional conflict analysis could be beneficial for transition studies; (2) critical moments are promising units of analysis in transition studies when analysing conflictual dynamics. (3) examining the dramaturgy of politics provides a useful framework and shed new light on where and how conflict in transition takes place and how it plays out.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 170
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Harper Collins p
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DELIBERATIVE POLICY
[3]   Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Rotmans, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) :543-569
[4]   Sociotechnical controversies as warning signs for niche governance [J].
Belmin, Raphael ;
Meynard, Jean-Marc ;
Julhia, Laurent ;
Casabianca, Francois .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 38 (05)
[5]   'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities':: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Sanden, Bjorn A. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2008, 20 (05) :575-592
[6]   . Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition [J].
Bosman, Rick ;
Loorbach, Derk ;
Frantzeskaki, Niki ;
Pistorius, Till .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2014, 13 :45-59
[7]  
Bulkeley H, 2015, URBAN POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPERIMENTATION AND THE GOVERNING OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL TRANSITIONS, P1
[8]  
Callon M., 1981, Revue Fundamenta Scientae, V2, P381
[9]  
Cobb S., 2006, HARVARD NEGOTIATION, V11, P147
[10]   Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands [J].
Cuppen, Eefje ;
Pesch, Udo ;
Remmerswaal, Sanne ;
Taanman, Mattijs .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 145 :165-175