US policy uncertainty and stock returns: evidence in the US and its spillovers to the European Union, China and Japan

被引:35
作者
Chiang, Thomas C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dept Finance, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Economic policy uncertainty; Downside risk; Uncertainty premium; Fiscal policy uncertainty; Monetary policy uncertainty; MONETARY-POLICY; MARKET RETURNS; FISCAL-POLICY; EXPECTED RETURNS; DOWNSIDE RISK; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; ASSET RETURNS; LONG-RUN; VOLATILITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/JRF-10-2019-0190
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose Recent empirical studies by Antonakakis, Chatziantoniou and Filis (2013), Brogaard and Detzel (2015) and Christou et al. (2017) present evidence, which supports the notion that a rise in economic policy uncertainty (EPU) will lead to a decline in stock prices. The purpose of this paper is to examine US categorical policy uncertainty on stock returns while controlling for implied volatility and downside risk. In addition to the domestic impacts of policy uncertainty, this paper also presents evidence that changes in US policy uncertainty promptly propagates to the global stock markets. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a GED-GARCH (1, 1) model to estimate changes of uncertainties in US monetary, fiscal and trade policies on stock returns for the sample period of January 1990-December 2018. Robustness test is conducted by using different set of data and modeling techniques. Findings This paper contributes to the literature in several aspects. First, testing of US aggregate data while controlling for downside risk and implied volatility, consistently, shows that responses of stock prices to US policy uncertainty changes, not only display a negative effect in the current period but also have at least a one-month time-lag. The evidence supports the uncertainty premium hypothesis. Second, extending the test to global data reveals that US policy uncertainty changes have a negative impact on markets in Europe, China and Japan. Third, testing the data in sectoral stock markets mainly displays statistically significant results with a negative sign. Fourth, the evidence consistently shows that changes in policy uncertainty present an inverse relation to the stock returns, regardless of whether uncertainty is moving upward or downward. Research limitations/implications The current research is limited to the markets in the USA, eurozone, China and Japan. This study can be extended to additional countries, such as emerging markets. Practical implications This paper provides a model that uses categorical policy uncertainty approach to explain stock price changes. The parametric estimates provide insightful information in advising investors for making portfolio decision. Social implications The estimated coefficients of changes in monetary policy uncertainty, fiscal policy uncertainty and trade policy uncertainty are informative in assisting policymakers to formulate effective financial policies. Originality/value This study extends the existing risk premium model in several directions. First, it separates the financial risk factors from the EPU innovations; second, instead of using EPU, this study investigates the effects from monetary policy, fiscal policy and trade policy uncertainties; third, in additional to an examination of the effects of US categorical policy uncertainties on its own markets, this study also investigates the spillover effects to global major markets; fourth, besides the aggregate stock markets, this study estimates the effects of US policy uncertainty innovations on the sectoral stock returns.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 657
页数:37
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   What are the effects of fiscal policy on asset markets? [J].
Afonso, Antonio ;
Sousa, Ricardo M. .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2011, 28 (04) :1871-1890
[2]   UNCERTAINTY, EVOLUTION, AND ECONOMIC THEORY [J].
Alchian, Armen A. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1950, 58 (03) :211-221
[3]  
Andrews E.L., 2018, WHY UNCERTAINTY SHOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Journal of Empirical Finance
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1938, Revue de l'Institut International de Statistique /Review of the International Statistical Institute, DOI DOI 10.2307/1400905
[6]   Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Filis, George .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 120 (01) :87-92
[7]   Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long-run evidence from the US [J].
Arouri, Mohamed ;
Estay, Christophe ;
Rault, Christophe ;
Roubaud, David .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 :136-141
[8]   STOCK RETURNS AND VOLATILITY [J].
BAILLIE, RT ;
DEGENNARO, RP .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1990, 25 (02) :203-214
[9]   Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty [J].
Baker, Scott R. ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Davis, Steven J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1593-1636
[10]   The intertemporal capital asset pricing model with dynamic conditional correlations [J].
Bali, Turan G. ;
Engle, Robert F. .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2010, 57 (04) :377-390