Multimedia learning trumps retrieval practice in psychology teaching

被引:5
作者
Jagerskog, Ann-Sofie [1 ]
Jonsson, Fredrik U. [2 ]
Selander, Staffan [3 ]
Jonsson, Bert [4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Humanities & Social Sci Educ, Svante Arrhenius Vag 20A, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, Kista, Sweden
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Psychol, Umea, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Learning; multimedia effect; retrieval practice; testing effect; visual illustration; Multimedia effect; learning; TESTS ENHANCE; CLASSROOM; RETENTION; MEMORY; PERFORMANCE; PRINCIPLE; FEEDBACK; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1111/sjop.12527
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is well established that studying with (vs. without) visual illustrations as well as taking tests (vs. restudying) is beneficial for learning, but on which strategy should one put the efforts, or should they be combined for best learning? Eighty-eight upper secondary school students were given a brief lecture presented verbally (6 classes) or with the aid of a visual illustration (visuoverbal, 6 classes). The information was processed again by taking a memory test or by restudying. Recall and transfer tests were conducted after some few minutes and again after one week. The visuoverbal lecture resulted in better learning than verbal presentation only. A significant study strategy by retention interval interaction was found. However, this interaction was not qualified by a testing effect. Hence, taking tests (retrieval practice) did not lead to better learning than restudying. It was concluded that it is worthwhile to use visual illustrations in teaching. However, the present study did not reveal any synergistic effects from the combination of visuoverbal presentation and retrieval practice.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 230
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, HDB METACOGNITION ED, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203876428
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, MULTIMEDIA LEARNING, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811678
  • [3] Atkinson R.C., 1968, PSYCHOL LEARNING MOT, V2, P89, DOI [10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3, DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3]
  • [4] EFFECTS OF FREQUENT CLASSROOM TESTING
    BANGERTDROWNS, RL
    KULIK, JA
    KULIK, CLC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 85 (02) : 89 - 99
  • [5] When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer
    Barnett, SM
    Ceci, SJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (04) : 612 - 637
  • [6] Bjork R.A., 1992, LEARNING PROCESSES C, V2, P35
  • [7] Why do some children benefit more from testing than others? Gist trace processing to explain the testing effect
    Bouwmeester, Samantha
    Verkoeijen, Peter P. J. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2011, 65 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [8] Butler A. C., 2007, EUROPEAN J COGNITIVE, V35, P1563
  • [9] Repeated Testing Produces Superior Transfer of Learning Relative to Repeated Studying
    Butler, Andrew C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) : 1118 - 1133
  • [10] The effects of tests on learning and forgetting
    Carpenter, Shana K.
    Pashier, Harold
    Wixted, John T.
    Vul, Edward
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (02) : 438 - 448