Darwin's missing link - A novel paradigm for evolution education

被引:44
作者
Catley, Kefyn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, George Peabody Coll Teachers, Dept Teaching & Learning, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/sce.20152
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Microevolutionary mechanisms are taught almost exclusively in our schools, to the detriment of those mechanisms that allow us to understand the larger picturemacroevolution. The results are demonstrable; as a result of the strong emphasis on micro processes in evolution education, students and teachers still have poor understanding of the processes which operate at the macro level, and virtually no understanding at all of the history of life on our planet. Natural selection has become synonymous with the suite of processes we call evolution. This paper makes the case for a paradigm shift in evolution education, so that both perspectives-micro and macro-are given equal weight. Increasingly, issues of bioethics, human origins, cloning, etc., are being cast in a light that requires an understanding of macroevolution. To deny our students access to this debate is to deny the call for universal science literacy. A methodology from professional practice is proposed that could achieve this goal, and discussed in light of its utility, theoretical underpinnings, and historical legacy. A mandate for research is proposed that focuses on learners' understanding of several challenging macroevolutionary concepts, including species, the formation of higher groups, deep time, and hierarchical thinking. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 783
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]  
2
[42]  
Rutledge ML, 2000, AM BIOL TEACH, V62, P23, DOI 10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0023:ETTNOS]2.0.CO
[43]  
2
[44]  
Samarapungavan A, 1997, COGNITIVE SCI, V21, P147
[45]   Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry [J].
Sandoval, WA ;
Reiser, BJ .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2004, 88 (03) :345-372
[46]   High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit [J].
Sandoval, WA ;
Morrison, K .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2003, 40 (04) :369-392
[47]  
SETTLAGE J, 1994, J RES SCI TEACH, V31, P449
[48]   Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution [J].
Sinatra, GM ;
Southerland, SA ;
McConaughy, F ;
Demastes, JW .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2003, 40 (05) :510-528
[49]   Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p-prims? [J].
Southerland, SA ;
Abrams, E ;
Cummins, CL ;
Anzelmo, J .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2001, 85 (04) :328-348
[50]   Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula [J].
Stewart, J ;
Rudolph, JL .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2001, 85 (03) :207-222