Competition of Banks as Two-sided Markets

被引:0
作者
Shao, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Int Business Sch, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
2014 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES AND OPTIMIZATION (CSO) | 2014年
关键词
two-sided markets; network externality; platform; equilibrium;
D O I
10.1109/CSO.2014.121
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Banks are two-sided markets when they supply payment platforms and make users interacting. The main characteristic of two-sided market is network externality, network externality determine the value of two-sided markets which is determined by users' number of both sides. A key question is the boundary or equilibrium of two-sided markets, if network externality works, the return of scale is increasing and the equilibrium is complete monopoly. The model in this paper indicate that if buyers and sellers intense attracted each other, the scale of this two-sided market will grow unlimited and the equilibrium is complete monopoly. If buyers and sellers mutual benefit each other not so intense, the scale of this two-sided market will convergence. The most important thing for platform competition is not only client quantity, but also reduce transaction costs and make both sides attract each other. For banks, improve user experience and supply more attractive financial goods and services is important for competition.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 650
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited [J].
Boyd, JH ;
De Nicolo, G .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (03) :1329-1343
[2]   COLLEGE ADMISSIONS AND STABILITY OF MARRIAGE [J].
GALE, D ;
SHAPLEY, LS .
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1962, 69 (01) :9-&
[3]  
Hoppensteadt F., 1975, Mathematical Theories of Populations: Deomgraphics, Genetics, and Epidemics, V20
[4]   Cooperation among competitors: some economics of payment card associations [J].
Rochet, JC ;
Tirole, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (04) :549-570
[5]   The Economics of Two-Sided Markets [J].
Rysman, Marc .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 23 (03) :125-143