Asset indexes and the measurement of poverty, inequality and welfare in Southeast Asia

被引:11
作者
Deutsch, Joseph [1 ]
Silber, Jacques [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wan, Guanghua [4 ]
Zhao, Mengxue [5 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] LISER, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[3] Ctr Camilo Dagum, Tuscan Interuniv Ctr, Adv Stat Equitable & Sustainable Dev, Pisa, Italy
[4] Fudan Univ, Inst World Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Achievement or welfare indices; Asset indices; Counting approach; Item response theory; Multidimensional poverty; Order of acquisition of durable goods; Ordinal inequality; HEALTH INEQUALITY; MATERIAL DEPRIVATION; HOUSEHOLD; WEALTH; ORDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101220
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using data on household consumer durables from the Asian Barometer Survey, this paper examines the evolution of inequality, poverty and welfare in six countries of South East Asia: Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam. We start by deriving the most common order of acquisition of these durables, using first an algorithm proposed by Paroush (1965), and then Item Response Theory. We also compute the frequency distribution of the number of durables owned by households. We then use these results to compute inequality, poverty and achievement or welfare indices adapted to the case of ordinal variables. Our empirical results confirm the existence of an order of acquisition. The results show that inequality was higher in Cambodia, Indonesia and the Philippines and lower in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia. A similar classification of countries was obtained when computing multidimensional poverty indices. Finally, using the welfare or achievement index recently introduced by Apouey et al. (2019), we found that welfare was generally higher in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia and lower in Cambodia, Indonesia and the Philippines. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement [J].
Alkire, Sabina ;
Foster, James .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2011, 95 (7-8) :476-487
[2]   Measuring health inequality using qualitative data [J].
Allison, RA ;
Foster, JE .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 23 (03) :505-524
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Scaling
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, KEY IND AS PAC
[5]   On Inequality-Sensitive and Additive Achievement Measures Based on Ordinal Data [J].
Apouey, Benedicte ;
Silber, Jacques ;
Xu, Yongsheng .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2020, 66 (02) :267-286
[6]  
Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2012, AS DEV OUTL ADO 2012
[7]  
ATKINSON A. B., 2003, J ECON INEQUAL, V1, P51, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1023903525276
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[9]   The dynamics of housing deprivation [J].
Ayala, Luis ;
Navarro, Carolina .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (01) :72-97
[10]   Durable goods, access to services and the derivation of an asset index: Comparing two methodologies and three countries [J].
Berenger, Valerie ;
Deutsch, Joseph ;
Silber, Jacques .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 35 :881-891