Structuring Decisions for Managing Threatened and Endangered Species in a Changing Climate

被引:36
作者
Gregory, Robin [1 ]
Arvai, Joseph [2 ,3 ]
Gerber, Leah R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Decis Res, Galiano Island, BC V0N 1P0, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Geog, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Decis Res, Eugene, OR 97401 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
collaborative decision making; environmental management; recovery choices; stakeholders; value trade-offs; CONSERVATION; RECOVERY; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; SCIENCE; HELP;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12165
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The management of endangered species under climate change is a challenging and often controversial task that incorporates input from a variety of different environmental, economic, social, and political interests. Yet many listing and recovery decisions for endangered species unfold on an ad hoc basis without reference to decision-aiding approaches that can improve the quality of management choices. Unlike many treatments of this issue, which consider endangered species management a science-based problem, we suggest that a clear decision-making process is equally necessary. In the face of new threats due to climate change, managers' choices about endangered species require closely linked analyses and deliberations that identify key objectives and develop measurable attributes, generate and compare management alternatives, estimate expected consequences and key sources of uncertainty, and clarify trade-offs across different dimensions of value. Several recent cases of endangered species conservation decisions illustrate our proposed decision-focused approach, including Gulf of Maine Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) recovery framework development, Cultus Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) management, and Upper Columbia River white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) recovery planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1212 / 1221
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Thinking, fast and slow
[2]   Adaptive management of the global climate problem: Bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy [J].
Arvai, Joseph ;
Bridge, Gavin ;
Dolsak, Nives ;
Franzese, Robert ;
Koontz, Tomas ;
Luginbuhl, April ;
Robbins, Paul ;
Richards, Kenneth ;
Korfmacher, Katrina Smith ;
Sohngen, Brent ;
Tansey, James ;
Thompson, Alexander .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 78 (01) :217-225
[3]   Protected values [J].
Baron, J ;
Spranca, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 70 (01) :1-16
[4]   Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the 'Celebritization' of climate change [J].
Boykoff, Maxwell T. ;
Goodman, Michael K. .
GEOFORUM, 2009, 40 (03) :395-406
[5]   Are Gray Wolves Endangered in the Northern Rocky Mountains? A Role for Social Science in Listing Determinations [J].
Bruskotter, Jeremy T. ;
Toman, Eric ;
Enzler, Sherry A. ;
Schmidt, Robert H. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 60 (11) :941-948
[6]  
Burgman M., 2005, Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management
[7]   Application of decision theory to conservation management: recovery of Hector's dolphin [J].
Conroy, Michael J. ;
Barker, Richard J. ;
Dillingham, Peter W. ;
Fletcher, David ;
Gormley, Andrew M. ;
Westbrooke, Ian M. .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (02) :93-102
[8]   Process-based models are required to manage ecological systems in a changing world [J].
Cuddington, K. ;
Fortin, M. -J. ;
Gerber, L. R. ;
Hastings, A. ;
Liebhold, A. ;
O'Connor, M. ;
Ray, C. .
ECOSPHERE, 2013, 4 (02)
[9]   Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting [J].
Game, Edward T. ;
Kareiva, Peter ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) :480-485
[10]  
Gerber LR, 2000, AM SCI, V88, P316, DOI 10.1511/2000.4.316